Jennifer Guiliano

Permanent URI for this collection

https://hdl.handle.net/1805/35562

Whose History Matters? Thinking about Collaboration and Open Access

Dr. Jennifer Guiliano’s research agenda includes completed peer-reviewed research grants, national and international presentations, digital products, and publications in three areas: (1) interdisciplinary research at the intersection of digital technologies and the humanities; (2) critical sport history; and (3) Native American and Indigenous History. A key aspect of her scholarly research, especially in Digital Humanities, is the establishment of long-term collaborative research partnerships that bring together faculty, staff, students, and technologists to explore the intersections of technology and scholarly practice. Dr. Guiliano’s teaching assignments also reflect her research interests by encouraging incorporation of digital history and digital methods. Through her research, Dr. Guiliano seeks to create an equitable and welcoming environment that fosters research excellence, transparency, and teaching and learning.

Dr. Guiliano’s work to encourage innovation, diversity, and inclusion on the IUPUI campus and beyond is another excellent example of how IUPUI’s faculty members are TRANSLATING their RESEARCH INTO PRACTICE.

Browse

Now showing 1 - 10 of 20

Transitioning Synchronous Workshops Into Asynchronous Digital Resources: A Case Study of Project Management and DevDH.org
(Routledge, 2023) Guiliano, Jennifer; Appleford, Simon; History, School of Liberal Arts
Editors' Note: June 2023
(IUPUI School of Liberal Arts, 2023-06-26) Risam, Roopika; Guiliano, Jennifer; History, School of Liberal Arts
Our frenetic summer at Reviews in Digital Humanities is in full swing. Last week, we held the first training for our summer cohort of topic editors. We introduced them to the steps of defining a vision for their first topic issues, and to the processes we use to manage communications here at Reviews (hint: we love spreadsheets).
Difficult Heritage and the Complexities of Indigenous Data
(McGill University, 2019-08-13) Guiliano, Jennifer; Heitman, Carolyn; History, School of Liberal Arts
For readers of this special issue, data are likely defined in technical terms as established by information and computer scientists. Data, for the informaticist, are facts, measurements or statistics. For the historian, data are historical remnants—often preserved by an archive. For the anthropologist, data can be quantitative or qualitative depending on the question and methods. Disciplinary methods aside, data are not value-neutral and thus must be contextualized in terms of their acquisition, analysis, and interpretation in order to transform data into information. For humanists, the cultural complexities of data and information are not new. Anthropologists, historians, linguists, museum curators, and archivists have long probed the contextual subjectivities of knowledge production and representation. From ink and quill maps representing the New World to the carefully stratified layers of an archeological site, data in the humanities are always subject to the systems of knowledge that were used to capture, represent, and disseminate them.
Review: Disability and Belonging
(IUPUI School of Liberal Arts, 2023-04-24) Guiliano, Jennifer; History, School of Liberal Arts
A review of Disability and Belonging, an ArcGIS StoryMap exploring the Camphill movement, directed by Katherine Sorrels.
Editors' Note: April 2022
(IUPUI School of Liberal Arts, 2022-04-19) Risam, Roopika; Guiliano, Jennifer; Brown, Aleia; Parham, Marisa; Muñoz, Trevor; History, School of Liberal Arts
Welcome to the April 2022 issue of Reviews in Digital Humanities, which is the first of our two-part special issue on Black DH. Given our commitment to making Reviews as space that supports the formation of review communities for areas of scholarship that have not been as recognized in digital humanities communities as they should be, we are delighted to share this special issue, guest edited by Aleia Brown, Marisa Parham, and Trevor Muñoz.
Editors' Note: December 2022
(IUPUI School of Liberal Arts, 2022-12-19) Risam, Roopika; Guiliano, Jennifer; History, School of Liberal Arts
Welcome to the December issue of Reviews in Digital Humanities. As we wrap up our third year of Reviews, we want to thank you for your enthusiasm, participation, and support for the journal. We wouldn’t be able to run the journal without such a generous community, so we’re incredibly grateful to you. We hope you have a restful holiday and wish you a happy and healthy new year.
Editors' Note: August 2021
(IUPUI School of Liberal Arts, 2021-08-16) Risam, Roopika; Guiliano, Jennifer; History, School of Liberal Arts
Welcome to the August 2021 issue of Reviews in Digital Humanities! This month, we are delighted to share the first installment of our special issue on sound, edited by Mary Caton Lingold. “Sound” is the first special issue of the journal to focus on a method and explores a broad range of interventions at the intersections of sound studies and digital humanities. Over the next three months, the special issue will explore experimental scholarship that blends sensory modalities, sonic histories, and the use of computational tools with large audio collections. Featuring sound demonstrates the journal’s commitment to creating spaces to showcase thriving areas of scholarship that do not always register within digital humanities broadly.
Review: Colonial Frontier Massacres in Australia, 1788-1930
(IUPUI School of Liberal Arts, 2022-11-28) Guiliano, Jennifer; History, School of Liberal Arts
A review of Colonial Frontier Massacres, an interactive web map of massacres on the Australian colonial frontier, developed by Lyndall Ryan, Bill Pascoe, and team.
What gets categorized counts: Controlled vocabularies, digital affordances, and the international digital humanities conference
(Oxford University Press, 2023-09) Guiliano, Jennifer; Estill, Laura; History, School of Liberal Arts
This article explores how terms are incorporated into the conference submission and review process for the international digital humanities conference. This article provides an overview of the Alliance for Digital Humanities Organizations (ADHO) conference reviewing process and how the controlled vocabulary structures the review process. We show how expanding and rethinking the controlled vocabulary can impact the experience of those who submit, review, and attend the conference. We consider how ConfTool, the submission and reviewing portal used for the international digital humanities conference, processes the controlled vocabulary and algorithmically influences the review of submissions. Ultimately, we advocate for the ability to make intentional and careful changes to conference vocabularies including considering the adoption of a formal ontology. We also suggest that changes to the ConfTool algorithm are needed to ensure a diverse and equitable future for digital humanities.
Neither Computer Science, nor Information Studies, nor Humanities Enough: What Is the Status of a Digital Humanities Conference Paper?
(Open Library of Humanities, 2022) Estill, Laura; Guiliano, Jennifer; History, School of Liberal Arts
This paper explores the disciplinary and regional conventions that surround the status of conference papers throughout their lifecycle from submission/abstract, review, presentation, and in some cases, publication. Focusing on national and international Digital Humanities conferences, while also acknowledging disciplinary conferences that inform Digital Humanities, this paper blends close readings of conference calls for papers with analysis of conference practices to reckon with what constitutes a conference submission and its status in relationship to disciplinary conventions, peer review, and publication outcomes. Ultimately, we argue that the best practice for Digital Humanities conferences is to be clear on the review and publication process so that participants can gauge how to accurately reflect their contributions.

Browse

Recent Submissions