- Browse by Date Submitted
Department of Human-Centered Computing
Permanent URI for this community
Browse
Browsing Department of Human-Centered Computing by browse.metadata.dateaccessioned
Now showing 1 - 10 of 287
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item IUPUI New Media Animation Projects(2005-02-14T22:08:50Z) Wiser, LeslieItem American Family Archive Project(2005-02-14T22:21:24Z) Wiser, LeslieItem Fitness Training Guide(2005-03-21T16:38:14Z) Reed, DavidThis interactive multi-media presentation guides the user through a fitness training regiment. It details specific excercises and muscle groups and discusses nutritional concerns.Item UITS Communications & Planning Office: 2002-2003 Year in Review Portfolio(2005-07-21T20:40:15Z) Hoffman, James C.This is an interactive portfolio showcasing the work of the UITS Communications & Planning Office. The portfolio presents a sampling of projects completed during the 2002-2003 fiscal year.Item Capstone 2003(2005-08-02) Nguyen, Diep (Christine) 1980-Item Multiple vantage points of the common operational picture: Supporting International Teamwork(HFES Press, 2006) McNeese, Michael D.; Pfaff, Mark S.; Connors, Erik S.; Obieta, Joaquin F.; Terrell, Ivanna S.; Friedenberg, Marc A.This paper summarizes multiple perspectives of the common operational picture (COP) in military and civilian crisis management domains viewed from three vantage points: historical, conceptual, and practical. The term COP extends prior research on large group displays to describe a visual representation of tactical, operational, and strategic information intended to generate situation awareness. We present four strata of interest to formulate an innovative conceptual framework of the COP based on user-team needs: structure, representation, processes, and management. This conceptual framework is applied as part of a review of recent and ongoing projects that examines current research gaps in the application of geographic information systems (GIS) to international humanitarian response.Item Post-tenure Review Then and Now: Retrospective and Prospective Study of Its Impact on Faculty and Higher Education(2011-10-07) Hook, Sara AnneWhen Dr. Christine Licata published Post-Tenure Faculty Evaluation: Threat or Opportunity? in 1986, it became the starting point for increased pressure on colleges and universities to address society’s concern that once faculty members were granted tenure, they were absolved of any expectation for continued productivity or accountability. Responding to this perceived “crisis” in higher education, the approaches taken in establishing post-tenure review systems varied greatly between institutions, including whether policies were developed by administration or faculty bodies, whether the process was formative or summative, whether the process was periodic or triggered by some identified deficiency, whether the process resulted in a development plan with resources to assist faculty members who needed to refresh or refocus and whether the process required peer review. Faculty members faced with adverse employment action because of post-tenure review have challenged these policies on a number of legal grounds. Twenty-five years later, it is appropriate to determine the impact of post-tenure on faculty and higher education, whether there has been a change in society’s perceptions about tenure and whether colleges and universities will turn to post-tenure review or a variation of it as a way to reduce expenses and increase flexibility during a time of significant financial challenges. This presentation will cover the history of and rationale for post-tenure review, the features of various post-tenure review systems, retrospective analysis of what has happened with post-tenure review over the past 25 years and a discussion of the potential for new emphasis on the use of post-tenure review policies in the future. The presenter chaired the committee that developed the post-tenure review policy at her campus and then helped implement the policy, including training for department chairs and deans.Item Legal Issues for Flutists(2012-08-10) Hook, Sara AnneThis practical and engaging presention will cover some of the major legal issues that flutists should be aware of at all levels of their careers.Item International Service Learning Through Microfinance: Enhancing Global Perspectives While Empowering Women(2012-04-20) Hook, Sara Anne; Oliver, AshleyThis presentation will illustrate how a microfinance project in Mexico is providing international service learning opportunities in online courses and outside the classroom. It will also demonstrate the power of academic and community partnerships in support of service learning and consider how to create meaningful learning experiences with a global perspective when travel may not be feasible. It will highlight the mentoring that takes place when a faculty member and a student work together to prepare grant proposals, participate in community events, give presentations and navigate cultural and language barriers to effectively advocate for a cause that they are both passionate about.Item Ethical Issues in IP Law Practice: Where the Rubber Meets the Rules(2011-05-14) Hook, Sara AnneUsing the race theme and symbols as a way to frame the discussion, this paper will highlight a variety of ethical issues that can emerge throughout the representation of a client in matters related to intellectual property law. These are complicated issues, made even more so by the changing nature of the practice of law, by technology and by the fluid nature of the national and global economy. It would be impossible to capture all of the potential ethical issues that could confront an attorney practicing in intellectual property law in one short paper or presentation. Therefore, this paper will wave a yellow flag over a few topics that are at the intersection between law and technology and that may be common to attorneys who deal with patent, trademark, trade secret and copyright law. The bibliography contains a number of resources that can assist attorneys in other matters related to ethical issues of practicing intellectual property law not covered in the paper.