Probing binding and cellular activity of pyrrolidinone and piperidinone small molecules targeting the urokinase receptor

dc.contributor.authorMani, Timmy
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Degang
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Donghui
dc.contributor.authorLi, Liwei
dc.contributor.authorKnabe, William Eric
dc.contributor.authorWang, Fang
dc.contributor.authorOh, Kyungsoo
dc.contributor.authorMeroueh, Samy O.
dc.contributor.departmentBiochemistry & Molecular Biology, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-13T19:01:56Z
dc.date.available2015-11-13T19:01:56Z
dc.date.issued2013-12
dc.description.abstractThe urokinase receptor (uPAR) is a cell-surface protein that is part of an intricate web of transient and tight protein interactions that promote cancer cell invasion and metastasis. Here, we evaluate the binding and biological activity of a new class of pyrrolidinone and piperidinone compounds, along with derivatives of previously-identified pyrazole and propylamine compounds. Competition assays revealed that the compounds displace a fluorescently labeled peptide (AE147-FAM) with inhibition constant (Ki ) values ranging from 6 to 63 μM. Structure-based computational pharmacophore analysis followed by extensive explicit-solvent molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and free energy calculations suggested the pyrazole-based and piperidinone-based compounds adopt different binding modes, despite their similar two-dimensional structures. In cells, pyrazole-based compounds showed significant inhibition of breast adenocarcinoma (MDA-MB-231) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) cell proliferation, but piperidinone-containing compounds exhibited no cytotoxicity even at concentrations of 100 μM. One pyrazole-based compound impaired MDA-MB-231 invasion, adhesion, and migration in a concentration-dependent manner, while the piperidinone inhibited only invasion. The pyrazole derivative inhibited matrix metalloprotease-9 (gelatinase) activity in a concentration-dependent manner, while the piperidinone showed no effect suggesting different mechanisms for inhibition of cell invasion. Signaling studies further highlighted these differences, showing that pyrazole compounds completely inhibited ERK phosphorylation and impaired HIF1α and NF-κB signaling, while pyrrolidinones and piperidinones had no effect. Annexin V staining suggested that the effect of the pyrazole-based compound on proliferation was due to cell killing through an apoptotic mechanism. The compounds identified represent valuable leads in the design of further derivatives with higher affinities and potential probes to unravel the protein-protein interactions of uPAR.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationMani, T., Liu, D., Zhou, D., Li, L., Knabe, W. E., Wang, F., … Meroueh, S. O. (2013). Probing Binding and Cellular Activity of Pyrrolidinone and Piperidinone Small Molecules Targeting the Urokinase Receptor. ChemMedChem, 8(12), 1963–1977. http://doi.org/10.1002/cmdc.201300340en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/7446
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1002/cmdc.201300340en_US
dc.relation.journalChemMedChemen_US
dc.rightsIUPUI Open Access Policyen_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectCanceren_US
dc.subjectInhibitorsen_US
dc.subjectInvasionen_US
dc.subjectMetastasisen_US
dc.subjectProtein-protein interactionen_US
dc.subjectSmall moleculesen_US
dc.subjectuPARen_US
dc.subjectUrokinaseen_US
dc.subjectUrokinase receptorsen_US
dc.titleProbing binding and cellular activity of pyrrolidinone and piperidinone small molecules targeting the urokinase receptoren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
nihms534207.pdf
Size:
1.34 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main Article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.88 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: