Clinic Factors Associated With Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) Completion: The Difference-Making Role of Support Staff

dc.contributor.authorDavis, Melinda M.
dc.contributor.authorSchneider, Jennifer L.
dc.contributor.authorPetrik, Amanda F.
dc.contributor.authorMiech, Edward J.
dc.contributor.authorYounger, Brittany
dc.contributor.authorEscaron, Anne L.
dc.contributor.authorRivelli, Jennifer S.
dc.contributor.authorThompson, Jamie H.
dc.contributor.authorNyongesa, Denis
dc.contributor.authorCoronado, Gloria D.
dc.contributor.departmentEmergency Medicine, School of Medicine
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-07T06:52:56Z
dc.date.available2024-05-07T06:52:56Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) programs can facilitate colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. We sought to identify modifiable, clinic-level factors that distinguish primary care clinics with higher vs lower FIT completion rates in response to a centralized mailed FIT program. Methods: We used baseline observational data from 15 clinics within a single urban federally qualified health center participating in a pragmatic trial to optimize a mailed FIT program. Clinic-level data included interviews with leadership using a guide informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and FIT completion rates. We used template analysis to identify explanatory factors and configurational comparative methods to identify specific combinations of clinic-level conditions that uniquely distinguished clinics with higher and lower FIT completion rates. Results: We interviewed 39 clinic leaders and identified 58 potential explanatory factors representing clinic workflows and the CFIR inner setting domain. Clinic-level FIT completion rates ranged from 30% to 56%. The configurational model for clinics with higher rates (≥37%) featured any 1 of the following 3 factors related to support staff: (1) adding back- or front-office staff in past 12 months, (2) having staff help patients resolve barriers to CRC screening, and (3) having staff hand out FITs/educate patients. The model for clinics with lower rates involved the combined absence of these same 3 factors. Conclusions: Three factors related to support staff differentiated clinics with higher and lower FIT completion rates. Adding nonphysician support staff and having those staff provide enabling services might help clinics optimize mailed FIT screening programs.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.identifier.citationDavis MM, Schneider JL, Petrik AF, et al. Clinic Factors Associated With Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) Completion: The Difference-Making Role of Support Staff. Ann Fam Med. 2022;20(2):123-129. doi:10.1370/afm.2772
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/40504
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherAnnals of Family Medicine
dc.relation.isversionof10.1370/afm.2772
dc.relation.journalAnnals of Family Medicine
dc.rightsPublisher Policy
dc.sourcePMC
dc.subjectPrimary health care
dc.subjectConfigurational comparative methods
dc.subjectFederally qualified health center
dc.subjectColorectal cancer
dc.subjectScreening
dc.subjectFecal immunochemical testing
dc.subjectMailed FIT
dc.subjectPragmatic trial
dc.subjectPractice-based research
dc.subjectSupport staff
dc.titleClinic Factors Associated With Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) Completion: The Difference-Making Role of Support Staff
dc.typeArticle
ul.alternative.fulltexthttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8959740/
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Davis2022ClinicFactors-PP.pdf
Size:
620.36 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.04 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: