In vitro Detection of Occlusal Caries on Permanent Teeth by a Visual, Light-Induced Fluorescence and Photothermal Radiometry and Modulated Luminescence Methods

dc.contributor.authorJallad, Mahmoud
dc.contributor.authorZero, Domenick
dc.contributor.authorEckert, George
dc.contributor.authorFerreira Zandona, Ag
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Cariology, Operative Dentistry, and Dental Public Health, IU School of Dentistryen_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-31T15:38:20Z
dc.date.available2016-03-31T15:38:20Z
dc.date.issued2015-10
dc.description.abstractBackground: The paradigm shift towards the nonsurgical management of dental caries relies on the early detection of the disease. Detection of caries at an early stage is of unequivocal importance for early preventive intervention. Objective: The aim of this in vitro study is to evaluate the performance of a visual examination using the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) criteria, two quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) systems - Inspektor™ Pro and QLF-D Biluminator™ 2 (Inspektor Research Systems B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands) - and a photothermal radiometry and modulated luminescence, The Canary System® (Quantum Dental Technologies, Toronto, Ont., Canada) on the detection of primary occlusal caries on permanent teeth. Methods: A total of 60 teeth with occlusal surface sites ranging from sound to noncavitated lesions (ICDAS 0-4) were assessed with each detection method twice in a random order. Histological validation was used to compare methods for sensitivity, specificity, percent correct, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), at standard and optimum sound thresholds. Interexaminer agreement and intraexaminer repeatability were measured using intraclass correlation coefficients. Results: Interexaminer agreement ranged between 0.48 (The Canary System®) and 0.96 (QLF-D Biluminator™ 2). Intraexaminer repeatability ranges were 0.33-0.63 (The Canary System®) and 0.96-0.99 (QLF-D Biluminator™ 2). The sensitivity range was 0.75-0.96 while that of specificity was 0.43-0.89. The AUC were 0.79 (The Canary System®), 0.87 (ICDAS), 0.90 (Inspektor™ Pro), and 0.94 (QLF-D Biluminator™ 2). Conclusion: ICDAS had the best combination of sensitivity and specificity followed by QLF-D Biluminator™ 2 at optimum threshold.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationJallad, M., Zero, D., Eckert, G., & Ferreira Zandona, A. (2015). In vitro Detection of Occlusal Caries on Permanent Teeth by a Visual, Light-Induced Fluorescence and Photothermal Radiometry and Modulated Luminescence Methods. Caries Research, 49(5), 523–530. http://doi.org/10.1159/000437214en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/9148
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKargeren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1159/000437214en_US
dc.relation.journalCaries Researchen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourceAuthoren_US
dc.subjectcaries detectionen_US
dc.subjectICDASen_US
dc.subjectThe Canary Systemen_US
dc.titleIn vitro Detection of Occlusal Caries on Permanent Teeth by a Visual, Light-Induced Fluorescence and Photothermal Radiometry and Modulated Luminescence Methodsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Jallad-2015-in-vitro-detection.pdf
Size:
424.94 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.88 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: