Adaptive change in simulation education: Comparison of effectiveness of a communication skill curriculum on death notification using in-person methods versus a digital communication platform

dc.contributor.authorHughes, Mary
dc.contributor.authorGerstner, Brett
dc.contributor.authorBona, Anna M.
dc.contributor.authorFalvo, Lauren
dc.contributor.authorSchroedle, Karen
dc.contributor.authorCooper, Dylan
dc.contributor.authorSarmiento, Elisa
dc.contributor.authorHobgood, Cherri
dc.contributor.authorAhmed, Rami
dc.contributor.departmentEmergency Medicine, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-15T16:12:41Z
dc.date.available2021-10-15T16:12:41Z
dc.date.issued2021-07
dc.description.abstractBackground Mandates to social distance and “shelter in place” during the COVID-19 pandemic necessitated the exploration of new academic content delivery methods. Digital communication platforms (DCP; e.g., Zoom) were widely used to facilitate content delivery, yet little is known about DCP’s capacity or effectiveness, especially for simulation. Objective The objective was to compare the experience, outcomes, and resources required to implement a simulation-based communication skill curriculum on death notification to a cohort of learners using in-person versus DCP delivery of the same content. Methods We used the GRIEV_ING mnemonic to train students in death notification techniques either in person or utilizing a DCP. For all learners, three measures were collected: knowledge, confidence, and performance. Individual learners completed knowledge and confidence assessments pre- and postintervention. All performance assessments were completed by standardized patients (SPs) in real time. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to identify differences in individual and between-group performances. Results Thirty-four learners participated (N = 34), 22 in person and 12 via DCP. There was a statistically significant improvement in both groups for all three measures: knowledge, confidence, and performance. Between-group comparisons revealed a difference in pretest confidence but no differences between groups in knowledge or performance. More preparation and prior planning were required to set up the DCP environment than the in-person event. Conclusions The in-person and DCP delivery of death notification training were comparable in their ability to improve individual knowledge, confidence, and performance. Additional preparation time, training, and practice with DCPs may be required for SPs, faculty, and learners less familiar with this technology.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationHughes, M., Gerstner, B., Bona, A., Falvo, L., Schroedle, K., Cooper, D., Sarmiento, E., Hobgood, C., & Ahmed, R. (2021). Adaptive change in simulation education: Comparison of effectiveness of a communication skill curriculum on death notification using in-person methods versus a digital communication platform. AEM Education and Training, 5(3), e10610. https://doi.org/10.1002/aet2.10610en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/26791
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1002/aet2.10610en_US
dc.relation.journalAEM Education and Trainingen_US
dc.rightsIUPUI Open Access Policyen_US
dc.sourceAuthoren_US
dc.subjectdeath notificationen_US
dc.subjectdelepresenceen_US
dc.subjectdigital communication platformen_US
dc.subjectdistance simulationen_US
dc.subjectGRIEVINGen_US
dc.subjecttelesimulationen_US
dc.titleAdaptive change in simulation education: Comparison of effectiveness of a communication skill curriculum on death notification using in-person methods versus a digital communication platformen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Hughes2021Adaptive-AAM.pdf
Size:
2.93 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Author's Manuscript
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: