Sharing the Stage: Exploring Inequities in Resources for the Arts Across Funding Institutions

Date
2024-10
Language
English
Embargo Lift Date
Committee Members
Degree
Degree Year
Department
Grantor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Found At
Sage
Can't use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us with the title of the item, permanent link, and specifics of your accommodation need.
Abstract

This paper examines and compares the funding distribution inequities in arts organizations across three different funding institutions—government grantmaking, charitable contributions, and crowdfunding—through different inequity measures. Based on three different datasets including the National Endowment for the Arts grants data, National Center for Charitable Statistics data, and Kickstarter crowdfunding data starting in 2009, we find that compared to non-arts funds on the same platforms, arts-related funds in these institutions are not more concentrated in the hands of a few, although the level of concentration is strikingly high. In addition, we find that nonprofit contributions are heavily concentrated, far more than government grants. However, contributions to arts nonprofits are not more concentrated than to other nonprofits. We also explore how the pandemic crisis impacted arts funding distributions.

Description
item.page.description.tableofcontents
item.page.relation.haspart
Cite As
Chen, W., & Noonan, D. (2024). Sharing the Stage: Exploring Inequities in Resources for the Arts Across Funding Institutions. American Behavioral Scientist, 68(11), 1431–1457. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642231179923
ISSN
Publisher
Series/Report
Sponsorship
Major
Extent
Identifier
Relation
Journal
American Behavioral Scientist
Source
Author
Alternative Title
Type
Article
Number
Volume
Conference Dates
Conference Host
Conference Location
Conference Name
Conference Panel
Conference Secretariat Location
Version
Author's manuscript
Full Text Available at
This item is under embargo {{howLong}}