Good governance, political experiences, and public support for mandatory sentencing: Evidence from a progressive US state

If you need an accessible version of this item, please email your request to digschol@iu.edu so that they may create one and provide it to you.
Date
2017-11
Language
American English
Embargo Lift Date
Department
Committee Members
Degree
Degree Year
Department
Grantor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Found At
Abstract

A shift in public mood and declining incarceration rates in the US signal a potential change in the politics of punishment. This research considers whether the public continues to support mandatory sentencing. The study expands upon existing knowledge by testing theoretical predictions about how instrumentalism, political beliefs and political participation affect public support for mandatory sentences. Drawing on a state-wide survey of 1,569 adults from Oregon the study found that belief in the effectiveness of prosecutors, judges, and prisons significantly influenced support for mandatory sentencing. Although 67% of those surveyed favored judicial discretion, a firm belief that “prisons work” may limit efforts to reduce incarceration and roll back mandatory sentences.

Description
item.page.description.tableofcontents
item.page.relation.haspart
Cite As
Sundt, J, Schwaeble, K & Merritt, CC. (2017).  “Good Governance, Political Participation, and Public Support for Mandatory Sentencing: Evidence from a Progressive US State.” Punishment and Society. DOI: 10.1177/1462474517747580
ISSN
Publisher
Series/Report
Sponsorship
Major
Extent
Identifier
Relation
Journal
Source
Alternative Title
Type
Article
Number
Volume
Conference Dates
Conference Host
Conference Location
Conference Name
Conference Panel
Conference Secretariat Location
Version
Full Text Available at
This item is under embargo {{howLong}}