Non-Dominant Hemisphere Excitability Is Unaffected during and after Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Dominant Hemisphere
dc.contributor.author | Wilkins, Erik W. | |
dc.contributor.author | Young, Richard J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Houston, Daniel | |
dc.contributor.author | Kawana, Eric | |
dc.contributor.author | Lopez Mora, Edgar | |
dc.contributor.author | Sunkara, Meghana S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Riley, Zachary A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Poston, Brach | |
dc.contributor.department | Exercise & Kinesiology, School of Health and Human Sciences | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-09-16T08:28:29Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-09-16T08:28:29Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024-07-12 | |
dc.description.abstract | Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) increases primary motor cortex (M1) excitability and improves motor performance when applied unilaterally to the dominant hemisphere. However, the influence of tDCS on contralateral M1 excitability both during and after application has not been quantified. The purpose was to determine the influence of tDCS applied to the dominant M1 on the excitability of the contralateral non-dominant M1. This study employed a double-blind, randomized, SHAM-controlled, within-subject crossover experimental design. Eighteen young adults performed two experimental sessions (tDCS, SHAM) in counterbalanced order separated by a one-week washout. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to quantify the excitability of the contralateral M1 to which anodal tDCS was applied for 20 min with a current strength of 1 mA. Motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes were assessed in 5 TMS test blocks (Pre, D5, D10, D15, and Post). The Pre and Post TMS test blocks were performed immediately before and after tDCS application, whereas the TMS test blocks performed during tDCS were completed at the 5, 10, and 15 min stimulation timepoints. MEPs were analyzed with a 2 condition (tDCS, SHAM) × 5 test (Pre, D5, D10, D15, Post) within-subject ANOVA. The main effect for condition (p = 0.213), the main effect for test (p = 0.502), and the condition × test interaction (p = 0.860) were all not statistically significant. These results indicate that tDCS does not modulate contralateral M1 excitability during or immediately after application, at least under the current set of common tDCS parameters of stimulation. | |
dc.eprint.version | Final published version | |
dc.identifier.citation | Wilkins EW, Young RJ, Houston D, et al. Non-Dominant Hemisphere Excitability Is Unaffected during and after Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Dominant Hemisphere. Brain Sci. 2024;14(7):694. Published 2024 Jul 12. doi:10.3390/brainsci14070694 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1805/43311 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | MDPI | |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.3390/brainsci14070694 | |
dc.relation.journal | Brain Sciences | |
dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
dc.source | PMC | |
dc.subject | Transcranial direct current stimulation | |
dc.subject | Transcranial magnetic stimulation | |
dc.subject | Cortical excitability | |
dc.subject | Motor evoked potential | |
dc.subject | Motor skill | |
dc.title | Non-Dominant Hemisphere Excitability Is Unaffected during and after Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Dominant Hemisphere | |
dc.type | Article |