Non-Dominant Hemisphere Excitability Is Unaffected during and after Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Dominant Hemisphere

dc.contributor.authorWilkins, Erik W.
dc.contributor.authorYoung, Richard J.
dc.contributor.authorHouston, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorKawana, Eric
dc.contributor.authorLopez Mora, Edgar
dc.contributor.authorSunkara, Meghana S.
dc.contributor.authorRiley, Zachary A.
dc.contributor.authorPoston, Brach
dc.contributor.departmentExercise & Kinesiology, School of Health and Human Sciences
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-16T08:28:29Z
dc.date.available2024-09-16T08:28:29Z
dc.date.issued2024-07-12
dc.description.abstractTranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) increases primary motor cortex (M1) excitability and improves motor performance when applied unilaterally to the dominant hemisphere. However, the influence of tDCS on contralateral M1 excitability both during and after application has not been quantified. The purpose was to determine the influence of tDCS applied to the dominant M1 on the excitability of the contralateral non-dominant M1. This study employed a double-blind, randomized, SHAM-controlled, within-subject crossover experimental design. Eighteen young adults performed two experimental sessions (tDCS, SHAM) in counterbalanced order separated by a one-week washout. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to quantify the excitability of the contralateral M1 to which anodal tDCS was applied for 20 min with a current strength of 1 mA. Motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes were assessed in 5 TMS test blocks (Pre, D5, D10, D15, and Post). The Pre and Post TMS test blocks were performed immediately before and after tDCS application, whereas the TMS test blocks performed during tDCS were completed at the 5, 10, and 15 min stimulation timepoints. MEPs were analyzed with a 2 condition (tDCS, SHAM) × 5 test (Pre, D5, D10, D15, Post) within-subject ANOVA. The main effect for condition (p = 0.213), the main effect for test (p = 0.502), and the condition × test interaction (p = 0.860) were all not statistically significant. These results indicate that tDCS does not modulate contralateral M1 excitability during or immediately after application, at least under the current set of common tDCS parameters of stimulation.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.identifier.citationWilkins EW, Young RJ, Houston D, et al. Non-Dominant Hemisphere Excitability Is Unaffected during and after Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Dominant Hemisphere. Brain Sci. 2024;14(7):694. Published 2024 Jul 12. doi:10.3390/brainsci14070694
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/43311
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.relation.isversionof10.3390/brainsci14070694
dc.relation.journalBrain Sciences
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourcePMC
dc.subjectTranscranial direct current stimulation
dc.subjectTranscranial magnetic stimulation
dc.subjectCortical excitability
dc.subjectMotor evoked potential
dc.subjectMotor skill
dc.titleNon-Dominant Hemisphere Excitability Is Unaffected during and after Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Dominant Hemisphere
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Wilkins2024NonDominant-CCBY.pdf
Size:
830.03 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.04 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: