Multi-Institutional Survey of Fourth Year Students’ Self Assessed Milestone Based Skill Proficiency and Faculty Expectation During an Emergency Medicine Clerk-ship: Implications For Curriculum Development

dc.contributor.authorPettit, Katie
dc.contributor.authorTurner, Joseph
dc.contributor.authorHogan, Kathryn
dc.contributor.authorPoznanski, Stacey
dc.contributor.authorPfennig-Bass, Camiron
dc.contributor.authorKouyoumjian, Sarkis
dc.contributor.authorHexom, Braden
dc.contributor.authorPerkins, Anthony
dc.contributor.authorPitre, Cory
dc.contributor.authorHumbert, Aloysius
dc.contributor.departmentEmergency Medicine, School of Medicine
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-14T14:18:17Z
dc.date.available2024-05-14T14:18:17Z
dc.date.issued2018-09-13
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Emergency medicine milestones suggest skill performance expectations for graduating medical students. The objective of this study is to examine differences between student’s perceived proficiency and faculty expectations relative to Level 1 EM milestones, identifying opportunities for curriculum development. Methods: Using ACGME milestone language, the authors developed a survey that measures student perceived skill proficiency with 22 skills, which was administered to fourth year medical students at 6 institutions. Similar surveys were sent to faculty to determine their expectations of students’ skill proficiency. Differences between student and faculty responses were calculated. Results: There were 608 student and 114 faculty responses. There was a statistically significant difference between mean student and faculty responses for 13 of the 22 skills. For 10 of these skills, students rated their own skill proficiency higher than faculty expectations. For 3 of the skills, faculty rated their expectations higher than students’ perceived proficiency. Conclusions: For pharmacology skills, student ratings were low, indicating an area to focus curriculum development. Items where student ratings are higher than faculty may be a result of overconfidence or a lack of understanding by faculty of students’ abilities. Formal assessment of skills in these areas would help clarify the reason and direct faculty and curriculum development.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.identifier.citationPettit K, Turner J, Hogan K, et al. Multi-Institutional Survey of Fourth Year Students' Self Assessed Milestone Based Skill Proficiency and Faculty Expectation During an Emergency Medicine Clerk-ship: Implications For Curriculum Development. MedEdPublish (2016). 2018;7:212. Published 2018 Sep 13. doi:10.15694/mep.2018.0000212.1
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/40727
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis
dc.relation.isversionof10.15694/mep.2018.0000212.1
dc.relation.journalMedEdPublish
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourcePMC
dc.subjectMedical students
dc.subjectFaculty expectations
dc.subjectMilestones
dc.subjectProficiency
dc.titleMulti-Institutional Survey of Fourth Year Students’ Self Assessed Milestone Based Skill Proficiency and Faculty Expectation During an Emergency Medicine Clerk-ship: Implications For Curriculum Development
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Pettit2018MultiInstitutional-CCBY.pdf
Size:
203.19 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.04 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: