Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Versus Doppler Ultrasound for Detection of Early Vascular Complications of Pancreas Grafts

dc.contributor.authorSwensson, Jordan
dc.contributor.authorHill, Danielle
dc.contributor.authorTirkes, Temel
dc.contributor.authorFridell, Jonathan
dc.contributor.authorPatel, Aashish
dc.contributor.departmentRadiology and Imaging Sciences, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-13T16:54:03Z
dc.date.available2022-06-13T16:54:03Z
dc.date.issued2020-11
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to compare conventional duplex ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for identifying vascular abnormalities in pancreas allografts in the immediate posttransplant setting. Identification of pancreas allografts at risk of failure may impact patient care because early intervention for vascular insufficiency can lead to graft salvage. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Two radiologists who were blinded to patient outcomes performed a retrospective analysis of the postoperative Doppler ultrasound and CEUS images of 34 pancreas grafts from transplants performed between 2017 and 2019. A total of 28 patients who did not require surgical reexploration were considered the control group. Six patients had surgically proven arterial or venous abnormalities on surgical reexploration. Each radiologist scored grafts as having normal or abnormal vascularity on the basis of image sets obtained using Doppler ultrasound only and CEUS only. Comparisons of both the diagnostic performance of each modality and interobserver agreement were performed. RESULTS. Both readers showed that CEUS had increased sensitivity for detecting vascular abnormalities (83.3% for both readers) compared with Doppler ultrasound (66.7% and 50.0%). For both readers, the specificity of CEUS was similar to that of Doppler imaging (81.6% and 78.9% for reader 1 and reader 2 versus 76.3% and 84.2% for reader 1 and reader 2). For both readers, the negative predictive value of CEUS was higher than that of Doppler ultrasound (96.9% and 96.8% for reader 1 and reader 2 versus 93.5% and 91.4% for reader 1 and reader 2). Interobserver agreement was higher for CEUS than for Doppler ultrasound (κ = 0.54 vs κ = 0.28). CONCLUSION. CEUS may provide radiologists and surgeons with a means of timely and effective evaluation of pancreas graft perfusion after surgery, and it may help identify grafts that could benefit from surgical salvage.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationSwensson J, Hill D, Tirkes T, Fridell J, Patel A. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Versus Doppler Ultrasound for Detection of Early Vascular Complications of Pancreas Grafts. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020;215(5):1093-1097. doi:10.2214/AJR.20.22858en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/29335
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Roentgen Ray Societyen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.2214/AJR.20.22858en_US
dc.relation.journalAmerican Journal of Roentgenologyen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectContrast-enhanced ultrasounden_US
dc.subjectDoppler ultrasounden_US
dc.subjectPancreas transplanten_US
dc.subjectPostoperativeen_US
dc.titleContrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Versus Doppler Ultrasound for Detection of Early Vascular Complications of Pancreas Graftsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
nihms-1681050.pdf
Size:
1.95 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: