A Comparison of Readings from Thermoluminescent Dosimeter Ring Badges Worn in Different Positions

If you need an accessible version of this item, please email your request to digschol@iu.edu so that they may create one and provide it to you.
Date
2020-12
Language
English
Embargo Lift Date
Committee Members
Degree
Degree Year
Department
Grantor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Found At
SNMMI
Abstract

Our purpose was to evaluate whether the position of a thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) crystal results in different exposure readings. Methods: Nine subjects wore 2 TLD badges (one facing inward, toward the palm, and one facing outward) for 2 mo. Both TLDs were worn on the middle finger of the dominant hand, with the inward-facing TLD placed at the bottom and the outward-facing TLD at the top. At the end of the first month, these TLDs were replaced with new ones for another month. Combined results from the badges for the 2 mo were recorded in millisieverts. A paired t test with 2-sample means was performed to compare the 2 positions in general nuclear medicine and PET/CT subjects, with an α of 0.05. Results: For all subjects and for the general nuclear medicine and PET/CT groups, mean exposure was greater for the inward-facing TLD. Conclusion: For a TLD worn on the dominant hand, extremity-exposure readings are maximized when the TLD faces inward.

Description
item.page.description.tableofcontents
item.page.relation.haspart
Cite As
Osborne, K. L., Nielsen, C. J., Bullock, J. R., & Jennings, S. G. (2020). A Comparison of Readings from Thermoluminescent Dosimeter Ring Badges Worn in Different Positions. Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology, 48(4), 361–362. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.120.243345
ISSN
Publisher
Series/Report
Sponsorship
Major
Extent
Identifier
Relation
Journal
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Source
Publisher
Alternative Title
Type
Article
Number
Volume
Conference Dates
Conference Host
Conference Location
Conference Name
Conference Panel
Conference Secretariat Location
Version
Final published version
Full Text Available at
This item is under embargo {{howLong}}