External validation of the ultrasound competency assessment tool

dc.contributor.authorRussell, Frances M.
dc.contributor.authorHerbert, Audrey
dc.contributor.authorKennedy, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorNti, Benjamin
dc.contributor.authorPowell, Mollie
dc.contributor.authorDavis, Jean
dc.contributor.authorFerre, Robinson
dc.contributor.departmentEmergency Medicine, School of Medicine
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-26T11:45:48Z
dc.date.available2024-08-26T11:45:48Z
dc.date.issued2023-06-22
dc.description.abstractObjective: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a core component of emergency medicine (EM) residency training. No standardized competency-based tool has gained widespread acceptance. The ultrasound competency assessment tool (UCAT) was recently derived and validated. We sought to externally validate the UCAT in a 3-year EM residency program. Methods: This was a convenience sample of PGY-1 to -3 residents. Utilizing the UCAT and an entrustment scale, as described in the original study, six different evaluators split into two groups graded residents in a simulated scenario involving a patient with blunt trauma and hypotension. Residents were asked to perform and interpret a focused assessment with sonography in trauma (FAST) examination and apply the findings to the simulated scenario. Demographics, prior POCUS experience, and self-assessed competency were collected. Each resident was evaluated simultaneously by three different evaluators with advanced ultrasound training utilizing the UCAT and entrustment scales. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between evaluators was calculated for each assessment domain; analysis of variance was used to compare UCAT performance and PGY level and prior POCUS experience. Results: Thirty-two residents (14 PGY-1, nine PGY-2, and nine PGY-3) completed the study. Overall, ICC was 0.9 for preparation, 0.57 for image acquisition, 0.3 for image optimization, and 0.46 for clinical integration. There was moderate correlation between number of FAST examinations performed and entrustment and UCAT composite scores. There was poor correlation between self-reported confidence and entrustment and UCAT composite scores. Conclusions: We had mixed results in our attempt to externally validate the UCAT with poor correlation between faculty and moderate to good correlation with faculty to diagnostic sonographer. More work is needed to validate the UCAT before adoption.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.identifier.citationRussell FM, Herbert A, Kennedy S, et al. External validation of the ultrasound competency assessment tool. AEM Educ Train. 2023;7(3):e10887. Published 2023 Jun 22. doi:10.1002/aet2.10887
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/42931
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.isversionof10.1002/aet2.10887
dc.relation.journalAEM Education and Training
dc.rightsPublisher Policy
dc.sourcePMC
dc.subjectPoint-of-care ultrasound (POCUS)
dc.subjectEmergency medicine (EM)
dc.subjectUltrasound competency assessment tool (UCAT)
dc.titleExternal validation of the ultrasound competency assessment tool
dc.typeArticle
ul.alternative.fulltexthttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10288010/
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Russell2023External-PP.pdf
Size:
814.13 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.04 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: