Abscess Size and Depth on Ultrasound and Association with Treatment Failure without Drainage

dc.contributor.authorRussell, Frances M.
dc.contributor.authorRutz, Matt
dc.contributor.authorRood, L. Ken
dc.contributor.authorMcGee, Justin
dc.contributor.authorSarmiento, Elisa J.
dc.contributor.departmentEmergency Medicine, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-19T19:32:43Z
dc.date.available2022-04-19T19:32:43Z
dc.date.issued2020-03
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI) occur along a continuum from cellulitis to abscess. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is effective in differentiating between these two diagnoses and guiding acute management decisions. Smaller and more superficial abscesses may not require a drainage procedure for cure. The goal of this study was to evaluate the optimal abscess size and depth cut-off for determining when a drainage procedure is necessary. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of adult patients with a SSTI who had POCUS performed. Patients were identified through an ultrasound database. We reviewed examinations for the presence, size, and depth of abscess. Medical records were reviewed to determine acute ED management and assess outcomes. The primary outcome evaluated the optimal abscess size and depth when a patient could be safely discharged without a drainage procedure. We defined a treatment failure as a return visit within seven days requiring admission, change in antibiotics, or drainage procedure. Results: A total of 162 patients had an abscess confirmed on POCUS and were discharged from the ED without a drainage procedure. The optimal cut-off to predict treatment failure by receiver operating curve analysis was 1.3 centimeters (cm) in longest dimension with a sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 37% (area under the curve [AUC] 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-0.76), and 0.4cm in depth with a sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 68% (AUC 0.83, 95% CI, 0.74-93). Conclusion: This retrospective data suggests that abscesses greater than 0.4 cm in depth from the skin surface may require a drainage procedure. Those less than 0.4 cm in depth may not require a drainage procedure and may be safely treated with antibiotics alone. Further prospective data is needed to validate these findings and to assess for an optimal size cut-off when a patient with a skin abscess may be discharged without a drainage procedure.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationRussell, F. M., Rutz, M., Rood, L. K., McGee, J., & Sarmiento, E. J. (2020). Abscess Size and Depth on Ultrasound and Association with Treatment Failure without Drainage. The western journal of emergency medicine, 21(2), 336–342. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2019.12.41921en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/28588
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publishereScholarshipen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.5811/westjem.2019.12.41921en_US
dc.relation.journalWestern Journal of Emergency Medicineen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 United States
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectAbscessen_US
dc.subjectAnti-bacterial agentsen_US
dc.subjectCellulitisen_US
dc.subjectPatient dischargeen_US
dc.subjectSoft tissue infectionsen_US
dc.titleAbscess Size and Depth on Ultrasound and Association with Treatment Failure without Drainageen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
wjem-21-336.pdf
Size:
377.61 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: