Validation of a Brief Measure for Complicated Grief Specific to Reproductive Loss

dc.contributor.authorBuskmiller, Cara
dc.contributor.authorGrauerholz, Kathryn R.
dc.contributor.authorBute, Jennifer
dc.contributor.authorBrann, Maria
dc.contributor.authorFredenburg, Michaelene
dc.contributor.authorRefuerzo, Jerrie S.
dc.contributor.departmentCommunication Studies, School of Liberal Arts
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-03T10:19:27Z
dc.date.available2024-01-03T10:19:27Z
dc.date.issued2023-04-20
dc.description.abstractObjective: Complicated grief reactions follow some pregnancy outcomes, like miscarriage, stillbirth, neonatal death, infant death, selective reduction, or termination of pregnancy. Stigma can delay treatment and worsen outcomes. Screening tools such as the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale detect complicated grief poorly, and specific tools for prolonged or complicated grief after a reproductive loss are cumbersome. In this study, a five-item questionnaire to detect complicated grief after reproductive loss of any type was designed and preliminary validated. Methods: A questionnaire patterned after the extensively validated Brief Grief Questionnaire (BGQ) was created by a group of physicians and lay advocates to employ non-traumatic but specific language related to grief after miscarriage, stillbirth, neonatal death, infant death, selective reduction, or termination of pregnancy. One hundred and forty women at a large academic center were recruited in person and via social media to validate the questionnaire with well-studied instruments for anxiety (7-item Panic Disorder Severity Scale, PDSS), trauma (22-item Impact of Events Scale), and reproductive grief and depressive symptoms (33-item Perinatal Grief Scale [PGS]). Results: The response rate was 74.9%. Of the 140 participants, 18 (12.8%) experienced their loss during high-risk pregnancies, and 65 (46.4%) were recruited via social media. Seventy-one (51%) respondents had a score > 4, a positive screen for the BGQ. On average, women experienced their loss 2 years prior to participation (IQR 1-5 years). Cronbach's alpha was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.69-0.83). The goodness of fit indices of the model met Fornell and Larker criteria (RMSEA = 0.167, CFI = 0.89, SRMR = 0.06). The AVE was 0.42 and the CR 0.78. Conclusions: This investigator-created screening tool is internally consistent and meets preliminary criteria for discriminant validity. This tool can be refined prior to testing for sensitivity and specificity in screening for complicated grief after a reproductive loss.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.identifier.citationBuskmiller C, Grauerholz KR, Bute J, Brann M, Fredenburg M, Refuerzo JS. Validation of a Brief Measure for Complicated Grief Specific to Reproductive Loss. Cureus. 2023;15(4):e37884. Published 2023 Apr 20. doi:10.7759/cureus.37884
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/37565
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Nature
dc.relation.isversionof10.7759/cureus.37884
dc.relation.journalCureus
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourcePMC
dc.subjectSurvey
dc.subjectAbortion
dc.subjectStillbirth
dc.subjectMiscarriage
dc.subjectNeonatal death
dc.subjectPostpartum depression
dc.subjectPregnancy loss
dc.subjectProlonged grief
dc.subjectScreening
dc.subjectPersistent complex bereavement disorder
dc.titleValidation of a Brief Measure for Complicated Grief Specific to Reproductive Loss
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
cureus-0015-00000037884.pdf
Size:
352.03 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: