Motor Learning in a Complex Motor Task Is Unaffected by Three Consecutive Days of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation

dc.contributor.authorWilkins, Erik W.
dc.contributor.authorPantovic, Milan
dc.contributor.authorNoorda, Kevin J.
dc.contributor.authorPremyanov, Mario I.
dc.contributor.authorBoss, Rhett
dc.contributor.authorDavidson, Ryder
dc.contributor.authorHagans, Taylor A.
dc.contributor.authorRiley, Zachary A.
dc.contributor.authorPoston, Brach
dc.contributor.departmentExercise & Kinesiology, School of Health and Human Sciences
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-09T06:59:34Z
dc.date.available2024-10-09T06:59:34Z
dc.date.issued2024-07-23
dc.description.abstractTranscranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) delivered to the primary motor cortex (M1) can increase cortical excitability, entrain neuronal firing patterns, and increase motor skill acquisition in simple motor tasks. The primary aim of this study was to assess the impact of tACS applied to M1 over three consecutive days of practice on the motor learning of a challenging overhand throwing task in young adults. The secondary aim was to examine the influence of tACS on M1 excitability. This study implemented a double-blind, randomized, SHAM-controlled, between-subjects experimental design. A total of 24 healthy young adults were divided into tACS and SHAM groups and performed three identical experimental sessions that comprised blocks of overhand throwing trials of the right dominant arm concurrent with application of tACS to the left M1. Performance in the overhand throwing task was quantified as the endpoint error. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were assessed in the right first dorsal interosseus (FDI) muscle with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to quantify changes in M1 excitability. Endpoint error was significantly decreased in the post-tests compared with the pre-tests when averaged over the three days of practice (p = 0.046), but this decrease was not statistically significant between the tACS and SHAM groups (p = 0.474). MEP amplitudes increased from the pre-tests to the post-tests (p = 0.003), but these increases were also not different between groups (p = 0.409). Overall, the main findings indicated that tACS applied to M1 over multiple days does not enhance motor learning in a complex task to a greater degree than practice alone (SHAM).
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.identifier.citationWilkins EW, Pantovic M, Noorda KJ, et al. Motor Learning in a Complex Motor Task Is Unaffected by Three Consecutive Days of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation. Bioengineering (Basel). 2024;11(8):744. Published 2024 Jul 23. doi:10.3390/bioengineering11080744
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/43818
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.relation.isversionof10.3390/bioengineering11080744
dc.relation.journalBioengineering
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourcePMC
dc.subjectTranscranial alternating current stimulation
dc.subjectTranscranial direct current stimulation
dc.subjectMotor learning
dc.subjectMotor skill
dc.subjectTranscranial magnetic stimulation
dc.subjectMotor evoked potential
dc.titleMotor Learning in a Complex Motor Task Is Unaffected by Three Consecutive Days of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Wilkins2024Motor-CCBY.pdf
Size:
991.48 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.04 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: