A Large Animal Survival Model to Evaluate Bariatric Surgery Mechanisms

dc.contributor.authorSimianu, Vlad V.
dc.contributor.authorSham, Jonathan G.
dc.contributor.authorWright, Andrew S.
dc.contributor.authorStewart, Skye D.
dc.contributor.authorAlloosh, Mouhamad
dc.contributor.authorSturek, Michael
dc.contributor.authorCummings, David E.
dc.contributor.authorFlum, David R.
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Cellular & Integrative Physiology, IU School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-18T13:05:50Z
dc.date.available2017-07-18T13:05:50Z
dc.date.issued2015-08
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The impact of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) on type 2 diabetes mellitus is thought to result from upper and/or lower gut hormone alterations. Evidence supporting these mechanisms is incomplete, in part because of limitations in relevant bariatric-surgery animal models, specifically the lack of naturally insulin-resistant large animals. With overfeeding, Ossabaw swine develop a robust metabolic syndrome, and may be suitable for studying post-surgical physiology. Whether bariatric surgery is feasible in these animals with acceptable survival is unknown. METHODS: Thirty-two Ossabaws were fed a high-fat, high-cholesterol diet to induce obesity and insulin resistance. These animals were assigned to RYGB (n = 8), RYGB with vagotomy (RYGB-V, n = 5), gastrojejunostomy (GJ, n = 10), GJ with duodenal exclusion (GJD, n = 7), or sham operation (n = 2) and were euthanized 60 days post-operatively. Post-operative changes in weight and food intake are reported. RESULTS: Survival to scheduled necropsy among surgical groups was 77%, living an average of 57 days post-operatively. Cardiac arrest under anesthesia occurred in 4 pigs. Greatest weight loss (18.0% ± 6%) and food intake decrease (57.0% ± 20%) occurred following RYGB while animals undergoing RYGB-V showed only 6.6% ± 3% weight loss despite 50.8% ± 25% food intake decrease. GJ (12.7% ± 4%) and GJD (1.2% ± 1%) pigs gained weight, but less than sham controls (13.4% ± 10%). CONCLUSIONS: A survival model of metabolic surgical procedures is feasible, leads to significant weight loss, and provides the opportunity to evaluate new interventions and subtle variations in surgical technique (e.g. vagus nerve sparing) that may provide new mechanistic insights.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationSimianu, V. V., Sham, J. G., Wright, A. S., Stewart, S. D., Alloosh, M., Sturek, M., … Flum, D. R. (2015). A Large Animal Survival Model to Evaluate Bariatric Surgery Mechanisms. Surgical Science, 6(8), 337–345. http://doi.org/10.4236/ss.2015.68050en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/13502
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherScientific Research Publishingen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.4236/ss.2015.68050en_US
dc.relation.journalSurgical Scienceen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectOssabawen_US
dc.subjectBariatric surgeryen_US
dc.subjectRoux-en-y gastric bypassen_US
dc.subjectWeight lossen_US
dc.subjectMetabolic syndromeen_US
dc.titleA Large Animal Survival Model to Evaluate Bariatric Surgery Mechanismsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
nihms-784167.pdf
Size:
246.29 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main Article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.88 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: