Vaccine hesitancy communication: What counts as evidence
dc.contributor.author | Parrish-Sprowl, John | |
dc.contributor.department | Communication Studies, School of Liberal Arts | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-04-12T14:49:50Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-04-12T14:49:50Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.description.abstract | The evidence base for vaccine hesitancy communication is generally confined to research focused on the content of the message rather than the process of communication. This has important consequences, because shifting focus to encompass the process of communicating, and not just on the content of content message being conveyed; opens the possibility of greater insight and understanding regarding the conversation health care workers have with those who are vaccine hesitant, creating increased chances of acceptance. | en_US |
dc.eprint.version | Author's manuscript | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Parrish-Sprowl, J. (2018). Vaccine hesitancy communication: What counts as evidence. Vaccine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.09.064 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1805/15845 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.09.064 | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Vaccine | en_US |
dc.rights | Publisher Policy | en_US |
dc.source | Author | en_US |
dc.subject | communication | en_US |
dc.subject | process | en_US |
dc.subject | evidence | en_US |
dc.title | Vaccine hesitancy communication: What counts as evidence | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Parrish-Sprowl-2017-Vaccine.pdf
- Size:
- 70.6 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- Accepted Manuscript
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- license.txt
- Size:
- 1.99 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Description: