Vaccine hesitancy communication: What counts as evidence

dc.contributor.authorParrish-Sprowl, John
dc.contributor.departmentCommunication Studies, School of Liberal Artsen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-12T14:49:50Z
dc.date.available2018-04-12T14:49:50Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractThe evidence base for vaccine hesitancy communication is generally confined to research focused on the content of the message rather than the process of communication. This has important consequences, because shifting focus to encompass the process of communicating, and not just on the content of content message being conveyed; opens the possibility of greater insight and understanding regarding the conversation health care workers have with those who are vaccine hesitant, creating increased chances of acceptance.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationParrish-Sprowl, J. (2018). Vaccine hesitancy communication: What counts as evidence. Vaccine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.09.064en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/15845
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.09.064en_US
dc.relation.journalVaccineen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourceAuthoren_US
dc.subjectcommunicationen_US
dc.subjectprocessen_US
dc.subjectevidenceen_US
dc.titleVaccine hesitancy communication: What counts as evidenceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Parrish-Sprowl-2017-Vaccine.pdf
Size:
70.6 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Accepted Manuscript
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: