The Influence of Different Inter-Trial Intervals on the Quantification of Intracortical Facilitation in the Primary Motor Cortex
dc.contributor.author | Pantovic, Milan | |
dc.contributor.author | Boss, Rhett | |
dc.contributor.author | Noorda, Kevin J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Premyanov, Mario I. | |
dc.contributor.author | Aynlender, Daniel G. | |
dc.contributor.author | Wilkins, Erik W. | |
dc.contributor.author | Boss, Sage | |
dc.contributor.author | Riley, Zachary A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Poston, Brach | |
dc.contributor.department | Exercise & Kinesiology, School of Health and Human Sciences | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-04-10T10:56:08Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-04-10T10:56:08Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-11-02 | |
dc.description.abstract | Intracortical facilitation (ICF) is a paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) measurement used to quantify interneuron activity in the primary motor cortex (M1) in healthy populations and motor disorders. Due to the prevalence of the technique, most of the stimulation parameters to optimize ICF quantification have been established. However, the underappreciated methodological issue of the time between ICF trials (inter-trial interval; ITI) has been unstandardized, and different ITIs have never been compared in a paired-pulse TMS study. This is important because single-pulse TMS studies have found motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude reductions over time during TMS trial blocks for short, but not long ITIs. The primary purpose was to determine the influence of different ITIs on the measurement of ICF. Twenty adults completed one experimental session that involved 4 separate ICF trial blocks with each utilizing a different ITI (4, 6, 8, and 10 s). Two-way ANOVAs indicated no significant ITI main effects for test MEP amplitudes, condition-test MEP amplitudes, and therefore ICF. Accordingly, all ITIs studied provided nearly identical ICF values when averaged over entire trial blocks. Therefore, it is recommended that ITIs of 4–6 s be utilized for ICF quantification to optimize participant comfort and experiment time efficiency. | |
dc.eprint.version | Final published version | |
dc.identifier.citation | Pantovic M, Boss R, Noorda KJ, et al. The Influence of Different Inter-Trial Intervals on the Quantification of Intracortical Facilitation in the Primary Motor Cortex. Bioengineering (Basel). 2023;10(11):1278. Published 2023 Nov 2. doi:10.3390/bioengineering10111278 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1805/39855 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | MDPI | |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.3390/bioengineering10111278 | |
dc.relation.journal | Bioengineering | |
dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
dc.source | PMC | |
dc.subject | Transcranial magnetic stimulation | |
dc.subject | Motor evoked potential | |
dc.subject | Intracortical facilitation | |
dc.subject | Short-interval intracortical inhibition | |
dc.subject | Electromyography | |
dc.title | The Influence of Different Inter-Trial Intervals on the Quantification of Intracortical Facilitation in the Primary Motor Cortex | |
dc.type | Article |