The Prognostic Value of Improving Congestion on Lung Ultrasound During Treatment for Acute Heart Failure Differs Based on Patient Characteristics at Admission
dc.contributor.author | Harrison, Nicholas E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Ehrman, Robert | |
dc.contributor.author | Collins, Sean | |
dc.contributor.author | Desai, Ankit A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Duggan, Nicole M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Ferre, Rob | |
dc.contributor.author | Gargani, Luna | |
dc.contributor.author | Goldsmith, Andrew | |
dc.contributor.author | Kapur, Tina | |
dc.contributor.author | Lane, Katie | |
dc.contributor.author | Levy, Phillip | |
dc.contributor.author | Li, Xiaochun | |
dc.contributor.author | Noble, Vicki E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Russell, Frances M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Pang, Peter | |
dc.contributor.department | Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-03-20T11:10:33Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-03-20T11:10:33Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Lung ultrasound congestion scoring (LUS-CS) is a congestion severity biomarker. The BLUSHED-AHF trial demonstrated feasibility for LUS-CS-guided therapy in acute heart failure (AHF). We investigated two questions: 1) does change (∆) in LUS-CS from emergency department (ED) to hospital-discharge predict patient outcomes, and 2) is the relationship between in-hospital decongestion and adverse events moderated by baseline risk-factors at admission? Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of 933 observations/128 patients from 5 hospitals in the BLUSHED-AHF trial receiving daily LUS. ∆LUS-CS from ED arrival to inpatient discharge (scale -160 to +160, where negative = improving congestion) was compared to a primary outcome of 30-day death/AHF-rehospitalization. Cox regression was used to adjust for mortality risk at admission [Get-With-The-Guidelines HF risk score (GWTG-RS)] and the discharge LUS-CS. An interaction between ∆LUS-CS and GWTG-RS was included, under the hypothesis that the association between decongestion intensity (by ∆LUS-CS) and adverse outcomes would be stronger in admitted patients with low-mortality risk but high baseline congestion. Results: Median age was 65 years, GWTG-RS 36, left ventricular ejection fraction 36 %, and ∆LUS-CS -20. In the multivariable analysis ∆LUS-CS was associated with event-free survival (HR = 0.61; 95 % CI: 0.38-0.97), while discharge LUS-CS (HR = 1.00; 95%CI: 0.54-1.84) did not add incremental prognostic value to ∆LUS-CS alone. As GWTG-RS rose, benefits of LUS-CS reduction attenuated (interaction p < 0.05). ∆LUS-CS and event-free survival were most strongly correlated in patients without tachycardia, tachypnea, hypotension, hyponatremia, uremia, advanced age, or history of myocardial infarction at ED/baseline, and those with low daily loop diuretic requirements. Conclusions: Reduction in ∆LUS-CS during AHF treatment was most associated with improved readmission-free survival in heavily congested patients with otherwise reassuring features at admission. ∆LUS-CS may be most useful as a measure to ensure adequate decongestion prior to discharge, to prevent early readmission, rather than modify survival. | |
dc.eprint.version | Author's manuscript | |
dc.identifier.citation | Harrison NE, Ehrman R, Collins S, et al. The prognostic value of improving congestion on lung ultrasound during treatment for acute heart failure differs based on patient characteristics at admission. J Cardiol. 2024;83(2):121-129. doi:10.1016/j.jjcc.2023.08.003 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1805/46401 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1016/j.jjcc.2023.08.003 | |
dc.relation.journal | Journal of Cardiology | |
dc.rights | Publisher Policy | |
dc.source | PMC | |
dc.subject | Acute decompensated heart failure | |
dc.subject | Acute heart failure | |
dc.subject | Lung ultrasound | |
dc.subject | Prognosis | |
dc.subject | Risk prediction | |
dc.title | The Prognostic Value of Improving Congestion on Lung Ultrasound During Treatment for Acute Heart Failure Differs Based on Patient Characteristics at Admission | |
dc.type | Article |