An investigation into emergency medicine resident cricothyrotomy competency: Is three the magic number?

dc.contributor.authorTurner, Joseph S.
dc.contributor.authorStewart, Lauren K.
dc.contributor.authorHybarger, Andrew C.
dc.contributor.authorEllender, Timothy J.
dc.contributor.authorStepsis, Tyler M.
dc.contributor.authorBartkus, Edward A.
dc.contributor.authorGarverick, Paul, II
dc.contributor.authorCooper, Dylan D.
dc.contributor.departmentEmergency Medicine, School of Medicine
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-10T12:22:48Z
dc.date.available2024-05-10T12:22:48Z
dc.date.issued2023-11-22
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Cricothyrotomy is a high-stakes emergency procedure. Because the procedure is rare, simulation is often used to train residents. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requires performance of three cricothyrotomies during residency, but the optimal number of training repetitions is unknown. Additional repetitions beyond three could increase proficiency, though it is unknown whether there is a threshold beyond which there is no benefit to additional repetition. The objective of this study was to establish a minimum number of simulated cricothyrotomy attempts beyond which additional attempts did not increase proficiency. Methods: This was a prospective, observational study conducted over 3 years at the simulation center of an academic emergency medicine residency program. Participants were residents participating in a cricothyrotomy training as part of a longitudinal airway curriculum course. The primary outcome was time to successful completion of the procedure as first-year residents. Secondary outcomes included time to completion as second- and third-year residents. Procedure times were plotted as a function of attempt number. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, repeated-measures analysis of variance, and correlation analysis. Preprocedure surveys collected further data regarding procedure experience, confidence, and comfort. Results: Sixty-nine first-year residents participated in the study. Steady improvement in time to completion was seen through the first six attempts (from a mean of 75 to 41 sec), after which no further significant improvement was found. Second- and third-year residents initially demonstrated slower performance than first-year residents but rapidly improved to surpass their first-year performance. Resident mean times at five attempts were faster with each year of residency (first-year 48 sec, second-year 30 sec, third-year 24 sec). There was no statistically significant correlation between confidence and time to complete the procedure. Conclusions: Additional repetition beyond the ACGME-endorsed three cricothyrotomy attempts may help increase proficiency. Periodic retraining may be important to maintain skills.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.identifier.citationTurner JS, Stewart LK, Hybarger AC, et al. An investigation into emergency medicine resident cricothyrotomy competency: Is three the magic number?. AEM Educ Train. 2023;7(6):e10917. Published 2023 Nov 22. doi:10.1002/aet2.10917
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/40642
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.isversionof10.1002/aet2.10917
dc.relation.journalAEM Education and Training
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourcePMC
dc.subjectCricothyrotomy
dc.subjectSimulated cricothyrotomy attempts
dc.subjectProficiency
dc.titleAn investigation into emergency medicine resident cricothyrotomy competency: Is three the magic number?
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Turner2023AnInvestigation-CCBYNCND.pdf
Size:
464.32 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.04 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: