Integrating social science into conservation planning

dc.contributor.authorNiemiec, Rebecca M.
dc.contributor.authorGruby, Rebecca
dc.contributor.authorQuartuch, Michael
dc.contributor.authorCavaliere, Christina T.
dc.contributor.authorTeel, Tara L.
dc.contributor.authorCrooks, Kevin
dc.contributor.authorSalerno, Jonathan
dc.contributor.authorSolomon, Jennifer N.
dc.contributor.authorJones, Kelly W.
dc.contributor.authorGavin, Michael
dc.contributor.authorLavoie, Anna
dc.contributor.authorStronza, Amanda
dc.contributor.authorMeth, Leah
dc.contributor.authorEnrici, Ash
dc.contributor.authorLanter, Katie
dc.contributor.authorBrowne, Christine
dc.contributor.authorProctor, Jonathan
dc.contributor.authorManfredo, Michael
dc.contributor.departmentLilly Family School of Philanthropyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-30T20:42:47Z
dc.date.available2023-01-30T20:42:47Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractA growing body of literature has highlighted the value of social science for conservation, yet the diverse approaches of the social sciences are still inconsistently incorporated in conservation initiatives. Building greater capacity for social science integration in conservation requires frameworks and case studies that provide concrete guidance and specific examples. To address this need, we have developed a framework aimed at expanding the role for social science in formal conservation planning processes. Our framework illustrates multiple ways in which social science research can contribute to four stages of such processes: 1) defining the problem and project team; 2) defining goals; 3) identifying impact pathways and designing interventions; and 4) developing and evaluating indicators of success (or failure). We then present a timely case study of wolf reintroduction in Colorado, U.S.A., to demonstrate the opportunities, challenges, and complexities of applying our framework in practice.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationNiemiec, R. M., Gruby, R., Quartuch, M., Cavaliere, C. T., Teel, T. L., Crooks, K., Salerno, J., Solomon, J. N., Jones, K. W., Gavin, M., Lavoie, A., Stronza, A., Meth, L., Enrici, A., Lanter, K., Browne, C., Proctor, J., & Manfredo, M. (2021). Integrating social science into conservation planning. Biological Conservation, 262, 109298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109298en_US
dc.identifier.issn0006-3207en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/31042
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109298en_US
dc.relation.journalBiological Conservationen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourcePublisheren_US
dc.subjectAdaptive managementen_US
dc.subjectConservation planningen_US
dc.subjectWolf reintroductionen_US
dc.subjectSocial scienceen_US
dc.titleIntegrating social science into conservation planningen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Niemiec2021Integrating-CCBYNCND.pdf
Size:
1.69 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: