Facilitating the task for second language processing research: A comparison of two testing paradigms
dc.contributor.author | Miller, A. Kate | |
dc.contributor.department | Department of World Languages & Cultures, School of Liberal Arts | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-03-16T17:54:15Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-03-16T17:54:15Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015-05 | |
dc.description.abstract | This study considers the effects of experimental task demands in research on second language sentence processing. Advanced learners and native speakers of French were presented with the same experimental sentences in two different tasks designed to probe for evidence of trace reactivation during processing: cross-modal priming (Nicol & Swinney, 1989) and probe classification during reading (Dekydtspotter, Miller, Schaefer, Chang, & Kim, 2010). Although the second language learners produced nontargetlike results on the cross-modal priming task, the probe classification during reading task revealed results suggestive of trace reactivation, which point to detailed structural representations during online sentence processing. The implications for current theories of second language sentence processing and for future research in this domain are discussed. | en_US |
dc.eprint.version | Author's manuscript | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Miller, A.K. (2015). Facilitating the task for second language processing research: A comparison of two testing paradigms. Applied Psycholinguistics; New York, 36(3), 613–637. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0142716413000362 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1805/12069 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Cambridge | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1017/S0142716413000362 | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Applied Psycholinguistics | en_US |
dc.rights | Publisher Policy | en_US |
dc.source | Author | en_US |
dc.subject | sentence processing | en_US |
dc.subject | second language French | en_US |
dc.subject | filler-gap dependencies | en_US |
dc.title | Facilitating the task for second language processing research: A comparison of two testing paradigms | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |