Motion artifacts in kidney stone imaging using single-source and dual-source dual-energy CT scanners: a phantom study

dc.contributor.authorIbrahim, El-Sayed H.
dc.contributor.authorCernigliaro, Joseph G.
dc.contributor.authorPooley, Robert A.
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, James C.
dc.contributor.authorHaley, William E.
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-26T14:43:31Z
dc.date.available2017-10-26T14:43:31Z
dc.date.issued2015-10
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) has shown the capability of differentiating uric acid (UA) from non-UA stones with 90-100% accuracy. With the invention of dual-source (DS) scanners, both low- and high-energy images are acquired simultaneously. However, DECT can also be performed by sequential acquisition of both images on single-source (SS) scanners. The objective of this study is to investigate the effects of motion artifacts on stone classification using both SS-DECT and DS-DECT. METHODS: 114 kidney stones of different types and sizes were imaged on both DS-DECT and SS-DECT scanners with tube voltages of 80 and 140 kVp with and without induced motion. Postprocessing was conducted to create material-specific images from corresponding low- and high-energy images. The dual-energy ratio (DER) and stone material were determined and compared among different scans. RESULTS: For the motionless scans, all stones were correctly classified with SS-DECT, while two cystine stones were misclassified with DS-DECT. When motion was induced, 94% of the stones were misclassified with SS-DECT versus 11% with DS-DECT (P < 0.0001). Stone size was not a factor in stone misclassification under motion. Stone type was not a factor in stone misclassification under motion with SS-DECT, although with DS-DECT, cystine showed higher number of stone misclassification. CONCLUSIONS: Motion artifacts could result in stone misclassification in DECT. This effect is more pronounced in SS-DECT versus DS-DECT, especially if stones of different types lie in close proximity to each other. Further, possible misinterpretation of the number of stones (i.e., missing one, or thinking that there are two) in DS-DECT could be a potentially significant problem.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationIbrahim, E.-S. H., Cernigliaro, J. G., Pooley, R. A., Williams, J. C., & Haley, W. E. (2015). Motion Artifacts in Kidney Stone Imaging Using Single-Source and Dual-Source Dual-Energy CT Scanners. A Phantom Study. Abdominal Imaging, 40(8), 3161–3167. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0530-9en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/14372
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1007/s00261-015-0530-9en_US
dc.relation.journalAbdominal Imagingen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectMotion artifactsen_US
dc.subjectDual-energy computed tomographyen_US
dc.subjectKidney stonesen_US
dc.subjectNephrolithiasisen_US
dc.titleMotion artifacts in kidney stone imaging using single-source and dual-source dual-energy CT scanners: a phantom studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
nihms864472.pdf
Size:
449.11 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.88 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: