Crisis event dispositions following a crisis response team intervention

dc.contributor.authorBailey, Katie
dc.contributor.authorLee, Guijin
dc.contributor.authorVictor, Grant
dc.contributor.authorSightes, Emily
dc.contributor.authorComartin, Erin
dc.contributor.authorGrommon, Eric
dc.contributor.authorRay, Bradley
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Public and Environmental Affairsen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-07T20:36:55Z
dc.date.available2023-04-07T20:36:55Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: We examined dispositions of crisis response team (CRT) events over 2 years in a large Midwestern city. METHOD: Between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2019, the CRT self-dispatched to mental/behavioral health-related 9-1-1 calls. Data utilized for analysis included demographic information of persons in crisis, crisis type, and crisis event dispositions. Crisis types were mental health, self-harm, and substance use related. Event dispositions included immediate detention, arrest, transport, and issue resolved. Multinomial regression models were used to predict crisis event dispositions as a function of the three crisis types, controlling for covariates. The sample included 1,426 events to distinct individuals. RESULTS: Most CRT events involved persons who were White (47.7%; n = 680), male (56.1%; n = 800), and an average of 39.3 years of age (SD = 16.6). Most crises were mental health (65.4%; n = 932), followed by self-harm (31.7%; n = 452), and substance use (25.9%; n = 370). Events were generally resolved at the scene (55.0%, n = 784); over a quarter resulted in immediate detention (26.9%, n = 384), followed by voluntary transport (14.0%, n = 200), and arrest (4.1%, n = 58). Crisis type was a significant predictor of event dispositions: Self-harm crises were associated with immediate detention and voluntary transport, and substance use crises with arrest. Homelessness was also a significant predictor of arrest. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The findings provide a better understanding of the short-term impact of CRTs. Data highlight how crisis type indicators predict event dispositions, demonstrating potential for more efficient emergency responder utilization by dispatching units according to crisis type. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationBailey, K., Lee, G., Victor, G., Sightes, E., Comartin, E., Grommon, E., & Ray, B. (2021). Crisis event dispositions following a crisis response team intervention. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 44(4), 310–317. https://doi.org/10.1037/prj0000501en_US
dc.identifier.issn1559-3126, 1095-158Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/32298
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherAPAen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1037/prj0000501en_US
dc.relation.journalPsychiatric Rehabilitation Journalen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourceAuthoren_US
dc.subjectCrisis Interventionen_US
dc.subjectMental Disordersen_US
dc.subjectSubstance-Related Disordersen_US
dc.subjectLaw Enforcementen_US
dc.titleCrisis event dispositions following a crisis response team interventionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Bailey2021Crisis-AAM.pdf
Size:
316.33 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: