The Decline of the Density Gradient is Not a Good Measure of Decentralization

dc.contributor.authorOttensmann, John R.
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Public and Environmental Affairs
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-09T12:33:43Z
dc.date.available2025-04-09T12:33:43Z
dc.date.issued2022-06-17
dc.description.abstractThe decrease in the density gradient estimated assuming the negative exponential decline of density has been used as a measure of the decentralization of the population in urban areas. A definition of urban population decentralization is presented and a measure of centralization is developed. The density gradient and its change are compared with this index of centralization, first in a numerical model and then using data on the distribution of the population in 43 large urban areas in 1970 and 2010. The density gradient is only somewhat related to this index and is not a good measure of decentralization.
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscript
dc.identifier.citationOttensmann, John R., The Decline of the Density Gradient is Not a Good Measure of Decentralization (June 17, 2022). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4139820 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4139820
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/46925
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.isversionof10.2139/ssrn.4139820
dc.relation.journalSSRN Electronic Journal
dc.rightsIU Indianapolis Open Access Policy
dc.sourceSSRN
dc.subjectDensity
dc.subjectGradient
dc.subjectNegative exponential
dc.subjectCentralization
dc.subjectDecentralization
dc.titleThe Decline of the Density Gradient is Not a Good Measure of Decentralization
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Ottensmann2022Decline-AAM.pdf
Size:
372.56 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.04 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: