Evaluation methods for vaccination campaigns on college campuses: A scoping review

dc.contributor.authorCarr, Alexcia
dc.contributor.authorPittman , Eric
dc.contributor.authorImeri , Hyllore
dc.contributor.authorNasruddin , Saara
dc.contributor.authorSparkmon, Wesley
dc.contributor.authorHead, Katharine J.
dc.contributor.authorVivo, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorBarnard , Marie
dc.contributor.departmentCommunication Studies, School of Liberal Arts
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-08T20:32:25Z
dc.date.available2024-05-08T20:32:25Z
dc.date.issued2022-12
dc.description.abstractBackground Vaccinations are successful, cost-effective tools to prevent the spread of certain infectious diseases. Many colleges conduct vaccination campaigns on their campuses for various vaccine-preventable diseases, including measles, mumps, influenza, HPV, and most recently, for SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for COVID-19. Implementing these campaigns requires substantial effort and understanding their effectiveness is an important factor in justifying these programs. Aim This scoping review aims to identify, review, and summarize existing evaluation methods for vaccination campaigns on college campuses in order to provide evaluation guidance for institutions planning future vaccination campaigns. Methods Publications that focused on vaccination campaigns on college campuses for students and/or faculty and staff and described their evaluation methods were included in our analysis. A systematic search of the literature identified 2,101 articles. After duplicates were removed, titles and abstracts were screened, and references searched, 43 articles were identified for full-text review. Sixteen articles provided evaluation information and were systematically reviewed. Results Interventions targeted a variety of vaccine-preventable diseases, with the majority either aiming to increase HPV vaccine uptake or vaccinate against meningococcal serogroups. Most studies reported on campaigns that included both educational activities and provided vaccinations. Evaluation methods varied widely. Some studies measured vaccine-related knowledge and attitudes. Vaccine uptake was most commonly measured as a simple count of doses administered. Conclusions College campus vaccination campaigns are evaluated in multiple ways, with little consistency in how the effectiveness of campaigns are measured. There is a need to develop clear evaluation methods for college vaccination programs, especially how to calculate vaccination rates associated with these efforts.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.identifier.citationCarr, A., Pittman, E., Imeri, H., Nasruddin, S., Sparkmon, W., Head, K. J., Vivo, S., & Barnard, M. (2022). Evaluation methods for vaccination campaigns on college campuses: A scoping review. Vaccine: X, 12, 100226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvacx.2022.100226
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/40567
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.jvacx.2022.100226
dc.relation.journalVaccine: X
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourcePublisher
dc.subjectHuman papillomavirus (HPV)
dc.subjectHPV vaccine
dc.subjectVaccination campaign
dc.subjectCollege
dc.subjectScoping review
dc.titleEvaluation methods for vaccination campaigns on college campuses: A scoping review
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Carr2022Evaluation-CCBYNCND.pdf
Size:
488.94 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: