Gender Differences in Experiences of Leadership Emergence Among Emergency Medicine Department Chairs

If you need an accessible version of this item, please submit a remediation request.
Date
2022-03-01
Language
American English
Embargo Lift Date
Committee Members
Degree
Degree Year
Department
Grantor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Found At
American Medical Association
Abstract

Importance: The number of women entering medicine continues to increase, but women remain underrepresented at all tiers of academic rank and chair leadership in EM. The proportion of female chairs in EM has not exceeded 12% in 2 decades.

Objective: To compare how male and female EM chairs experience leadership emergence, with attention to factors associated with support of the emergence of female chairs.

Design, setting, and participants: This qualitative descriptive study was conducted between April 2020 and February 2021 at 36 US academic EM departments. Eligible participants were all current and emeritus female EM academic department chairs (with a possible cohort of 20 individuals) and an equal number of randomly selected male chairs.

Interventions: Semistructured interviews were conducted via teleconferencing with an 11-item interview guide.

Main outcomes and measures: Qualitative findings identifying similarities and gender differences in leadership emergence were collected.

Results: Among 20 female chairs in EM, 19 women (mean [SD] age, 56.2 [7.1] years) participated in the study (95.0% response rate). There were 13 active chairs, and 6 women were within 5 years of chair leadership. Among 77 male chairs in EM identified and randomized, 37 men were invited to participate, among whom 19 individuals (51.4%) agreed to participate; 18 men (mean [SD] age, 52.2 [7.5] years) completed their interviews. Reflecting upon their experiences of leadership emergence, male chairs saw leadership as their destiny, were motivated to be chairs to gain influence, were dismissive of risks associated with chairing a department, and were sponsored by senior male leaders to advance in leadership. Female chairs saw leadership as something they had long prepared for, were motivated to be chairs to make a difference, were cautious of risks associated with chairing a department that could derail their careers, and relied on their own efforts to advance in leadership.

Conclusions and relevance: This study found that experiences of leadership emergence differed by gender. These results suggest that leadership development strategies tailored to women should promote early internalization of leadership identity, tightly link leadership to purpose, cultivate active sponsorship, and encourage women's risk tolerance through leadership validation to support women's development as leaders and demonstrate a commitment to gender equity in EM leadership.

Description
item.page.description.tableofcontents
item.page.relation.haspart
Cite As
Hobgood C, Draucker C. Gender Differences in Experiences of Leadership Emergence Among Emergency Medicine Department Chairs. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(3):e221860. Published 2022 Mar 1. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.1860
ISSN
Publisher
Series/Report
Sponsorship
Major
Extent
Identifier
Relation
Journal
JAMA Network Open
Source
PMC
Alternative Title
Type
Article
Number
Volume
Conference Dates
Conference Host
Conference Location
Conference Name
Conference Panel
Conference Secretariat Location
Version
Full Text Available at
This item is under embargo {{howLong}}