The dangers of reused personal protective equipment: healthcare workers and workstation contamination

dc.contributor.authorDoos, D.
dc.contributor.authorBarach, P.
dc.contributor.authorAlves, N.J.
dc.contributor.authorFalvo, L.
dc.contributor.authorBona, A.
dc.contributor.authorMoore, M.
dc.contributor.authorCooper, D.D.
dc.contributor.authorLefort, R.
dc.contributor.authorAhmed, R.
dc.contributor.departmentEmergency Medicine, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-07T14:42:38Z
dc.date.available2023-07-07T14:42:38Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractBackground: Personal protective equipment (PPE) is essential to protect healthcare workers (HCWs). The practice of reusing PPE poses high levels of risk for accidental contamination by HCWs. Scarce medical literature compares practical means or methods for safe reuse of PPE while actively caring for patients. Methods: In this study, observations were made of 28 experienced clinical participants performing five donning and doffing encounters while performing simulated full evaluations of patients with coronavirus disease 2019. Participants' N95 respirators were coated with a fluorescent dye to evaluate any accidental fomite transfer that occurred during PPE donning and doffing. Participants were evaluated using blacklight after each doffing encounter to evaluate new contamination sites, and were assessed for the cumulative surface area that occurred due to PPE doffing. Additionally, participants' workstations were evaluated for contamination. Results: All participants experienced some contamination on their upper extremities, neck and face. The highest cumulative area of fomite transfer risk was associated with the hook and paper bag storage methods, and the least contamination occurred with the tabletop storage method. Storing a reused N95 respirator on a tabletop was found to be a safer alternative than the current recommendation of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to use a paper bag for storage. All participants donning and doffing PPE were contaminated. Conclusion: PPE reusage practices pose an unacceptably high level of risk of accidental cross-infection contamination to healthcare workers. The current design of PPE requires complete redesign with improved engineering and usability to protect healthcare workers.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationDoos D, Barach P, Alves NJ, et al. The dangers of reused personal protective equipment: healthcare workers and workstation contamination. J Hosp Infect. 2022;127:59-68. doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2022.05.016en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/34211
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.jhin.2022.05.016en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Hospital Infectionen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectHealthcare workersen_US
dc.subjectPersonal protective equipmenten_US
dc.subjectHuman factorsen_US
dc.subjectContaminationen_US
dc.subjectWorker safetyen_US
dc.subjectOccupational hazardsen_US
dc.titleThe dangers of reused personal protective equipment: healthcare workers and workstation contaminationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
ul.alternative.fulltexthttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9172254/en_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
main.pdf
Size:
1.46 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: