Opinion: Why institutional review boards should have a role in the open science movement

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorGrant, Sean
dc.contributor.authorBouskill, Kathryn E.
dc.contributor.departmentSocial and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Healthen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-23T18:29:01Z
dc.date.available2020-01-23T18:29:01Z
dc.date.issued2019-10-22
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationGrant, S., & Bouskill, K. E. (2019). Opinion: Why institutional review boards should have a role in the open science movement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(43), 21336–21338. doi:10.1073/pnas.1916420116en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/21888
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherNational Academy of Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1073/pnas.1916420116en_US
dc.relation.journalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of Americaen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectInstitutional review boardsen_US
dc.subjectOpen science movementen_US
dc.subjectSystems approachen_US
dc.subjectTransparencyen_US
dc.subjectReproducibilityen_US
dc.titleOpinion: Why institutional review boards should have a role in the open science movementen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
pnas.201916420.pdf
Size:
1.16 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Open Access Policy Articles
Community and Global Health Works