Comparison of Oropharyngeal Oxygen Pooling and Suctioning During Intubated and Nonintubated Dental Office-Based Anesthesia

dc.contributor.authorRafla, Rebecca R.
dc.contributor.authorSaxen, Mark A.
dc.contributor.authorYepes, Juan F.
dc.contributor.authorJones, James E.
dc.contributor.authorVinson, LaQuia A.
dc.contributor.departmentOral Pathology, Medicine and Radiology, School of Dentistry
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-08T12:04:36Z
dc.date.available2024-03-08T12:04:36Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractObjective: The risk of a spontaneous surgical fire increases as oxygen concentrations surrounding the surgical site rise above the normal atmospheric level of 21%. Previously published in vitro findings imply this phenomenon (termed oxygen pooling) occurs during dental procedures under sedation and general anesthesia; however, it has not been clinically documented. Methods: Thirty-one children classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists I and II between 2 and 6 years of age undergoing office-based general anesthesia for complete dental rehabilitation were monitored for intraoral ambient oxygen concentration, end-tidal CO2, and respiratory rate changes immediately following nasotracheal intubation or insertion of nasopharyngeal airways, followed by high-speed suctioning of the oral cavity during simulated dental treatment. Results: Mean ambient intraoral oxygen concentrations ranging from 46.9% to 72.1%, levels consistent with oxygen pooling, occurred in the nasopharyngeal airway group prior to the introduction of high-speed oral suctioning. However, 1 minute of suctioning reversed the oxygen pooling to 31.2%. Oropharyngeal ambient oxygen concentrations in patients with uncuffed endotracheal tubes ranged from 24.1% to 26.6% prior to high-speed suctioning, which reversed the pooling to 21.1% after 1 minute. Conclusion: This study demonstrated significant oxygen pooling with nasopharyngeal airway use before and after high-speed suctioning. Uncuffed endotracheal intubation showed minimal pooling, which was reversed to room air ambient oxygen concentrations after 1 minute of suctioning.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.identifier.citationRafla RR, Saxen MA, Yepes JF, Jones JE, Vinson LA. Comparison of Oropharyngeal Oxygen Pooling and Suctioning During Intubated and Nonintubated Dental Office-Based Anesthesia. Anesth Prog. 2023;70(1):3-8. doi:10.2344/anpr-70-01-02
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/39110
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherAllen Press
dc.relation.isversionof10.2344/anpr-70-01-02
dc.relation.journalAnesthesia Progress
dc.rightsPublisher Policy
dc.sourcePMC
dc.subjectOffice-based general anesthesia
dc.subjectOperative dentistry
dc.subjectOxygen pooling
dc.subjectPediatric dentistry
dc.subjectSurgical fires
dc.titleComparison of Oropharyngeal Oxygen Pooling and Suctioning During Intubated and Nonintubated Dental Office-Based Anesthesia
dc.typeArticle
ul.alternative.fulltexthttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10069532/
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
i1878-7177-70-1-3.pdf
Size:
362.98 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: