A Randomized Controlled Trial Translating the Diabetes Prevention Program to a University Worksite, Ohio, 2012-2014

dc.contributor.authorWeinhold, Kellie R.
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Carla K.
dc.contributor.authorMarrero, David G.
dc.contributor.authorNagaraja, Haikady N.
dc.contributor.authorFocht, Brian C.
dc.contributor.authorGascon, Gregg M.
dc.contributor.departmentIndiana University School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-11T12:53:01Z
dc.date.available2016-07-11T12:53:01Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: Working adults spend much time at the workplace, an ideal setting for wellness programs targeting weight loss and disease prevention. Few randomized trials have evaluated the efficacy of worksite diabetes prevention programs. This study evaluated the efficacy of a worksite lifestyle intervention on metabolic and behavioral risk factors compared with usual care. METHODS: A pretest-posttest control group design with 3-month follow-up was used. Participants with prediabetes were recruited from a university worksite and randomized to receive a 16-week lifestyle intervention (n = 35) or usual care (n = 34). Participants were evaluated at baseline, postintervention, and 3-month follow-up. Dietary intake was measured by a food frequency questionnaire and level of physical activity by accelerometers. Repeated measures analysis of variance compared the change in outcomes between and within groups. RESULTS: Mean (standard error [SE]) weight loss was greater in the intervention (-5.5% [0.6%]) than in the control (-0.4% [0.5%]) group (P < .001) postintervention and was sustained at 3-month follow-up (P < .001). Mean (SE) reductions in fasting glucose were greater in the intervention (-8.6 [1.6] mg/dL) than in the control (-3.7 [1.6] mg/dL) group (P = .02) postintervention; both groups had significant glucose reductions at 3-month follow-up (P < .001). In the intervention group, the intake of total energy and the percentage of energy from all fats, saturated fats, and trans fats decreased, and the intake of dietary fiber increased (all P < .01) postintervention. CONCLUSION: The worksite intervention improved metabolic and behavioral risk factors among employees with prediabetes. The long-term impact on diabetes prevention and program sustainability warrant further investigation.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationWeinhold, K. R., Miller, C. K., Marrero, D. G., Nagaraja, H. N., Focht, B. C., & Gascon, G. M. (2015). A Randomized Controlled Trial Translating the Diabetes Prevention Program to a University Worksite, Ohio, 2012-2014. Preventing Chronic Disease, 12, E210. http://doi.org/10.5888/pcd12.150301en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/10334
dc.publisherPreventing Chronic Diseaseen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.5888/pcd12.150301en_US
dc.relation.journalPreventing Chronic Diseaseen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.titleA Randomized Controlled Trial Translating the Diabetes Prevention Program to a University Worksite, Ohio, 2012-2014en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
ul.alternative.fulltexthttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26605710en_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
PCD-12-E210.pdf
Size:
501.72 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.88 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: