Department of Communication Studies Works

Permanent URI for this collection

https://hdl.handle.net/1805/4119

Browse

Now showing 1 - 10 of 140

A case for a quantum informed approach to health communication research
(Frontiers, 2023-08) Parrish-Sprowl, John; Parrish-Sprowl, Susan; Communication Studies, School of Liberal Arts
Foundational social science has dominated health communication research, especially in the mainstream of Western scholarship. Alternative ways of conceptualizing, including most if not all indigenous ways of thinking, have often been relegated to second class status, if regarded at all. For those who questioned prevailing wisdom in the past, the choice regarding theory and research seemed to be one of going in a more interpretive or critical direction and leaving “science” behind or staying within a framework they found wanting in many ways. Ironically, the work of such Communication scholars as Pearce, Dutta, and others, often born from interpretative and critical perspectives, is much more consonant with quantum framed science than social science as practiced. Indeed, much of the body of indigenous perspectives align with quantum theory informed science better than social science as practiced. As we move through the 21st century, it is time that communication theory and research, especially in health communication, moves to reclaim science in ways that shift us from a Newtonian understanding of the world to more a quantum paradigm. As we do so, we will likely find that many who have been on the margins can and should move their work to the mainstream, albeit with a process that synthesizes their work with quantum science. This would help us move forward in ways that not only invite more inclusion, but also create more meaningful ways of conceptualizing communication and its relationship to health.
A multi-site pilot study of a parent-centered tool to promote shared decision-making in hypospadias care
(Elsevier, 2023) Binion, Kelsey E.; Rode, Akash Uday; Nortey, Gabrielle; Miller, Andrew D.; Misseri, Rosalia; Kaefer, Martin; Ross, Sherry; Preisser, John S.; Hu, Di; Chan, Katherine H.; Communication Studies, School of Liberal Arts
Background: Using a user-centered design approach, we conducted a two-site pilot study to evaluate a decision aid (DA) website, the Hypospadias Hub, for parents of hypospadias patients. Objectives: The objectives were to assess the Hub's acceptability, remote usability, and feasibility of study procedures, and to evaluate its preliminary efficacy. Methods: From June 2021-February 2022, we recruited English-speaking parents (≥18 years old) of hypospadias patients (≤5 years) and delivered the Hub electronically ≤2 months before their hypospadias consultation. We collected website analytic data using an ad tracker plug-in. We inquired about treatment preference, hypospadias knowledge, and decisional conflict (Decisional Conflict Scale) at baseline, after viewing the Hub (pre-consultation), and post-consultation. We administered the Decision Aid Acceptability Questionnaire (DAAQ) and the Preparation for Decision-Making Scale (PrepDM) which assessed how well the Hub prepared parents for decision-making with the urologist. Post-consultation, we assessed participants' perception of involvement in decision-making with the Shared Decision-making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) and the Decision Regret Scale (DRS). A bivariate analysis compared participants' baseline and pre/post-consultation hypospadias knowledge, decisional conflict, and treatment preference. Using a thematic analysis, we analyzed our semi-structured interviews to uncover how the Hub impacted the consultation and what influenced participants' decisions. Results: Of 148 parents contacted, 134 were eligible and 65/134 (48.5%) enrolled: mean age 29.2, 96.9% female, 76.6% White (Extended Summary Figure). Pre/post-viewing the Hub, there was a statistically significant increase in hypospadias knowledge (54.3 vs. 75.6, p < 0.001) and decrease in decisional conflict (36.0 vs. 21.9, p < 0.001). Most participants (83.3%) thought Hub's length and amount of information (70.4%) was "about right", and 93.0% found most or everything was clear. Pre/post-consultation, there was a statistically significant decrease in decisional conflict (21.9 vs. 8.8, p < 0.001). PrepDM's mean score was 82.6/100 (SD = 14.1); SDM-Q-9's mean score was 82.5/100 (SD = 16.7). DCS's mean score was 25.0/100 (SD = 47.03). Each participant spent an average of 25.75 min reviewing the Hub. Based on thematic analysis, the Hub helped participants feel prepared for the consultation. Discussion: Participants engaged extensively with the Hub and demonstrated improved hypospadias knowledge and decision quality. They felt prepared for the consultation and perceived a high degree of involvement in decision-making. Conclusion: As the first pilot test of a pediatric urology DA, the Hub was acceptable and study procedures were feasible. We plan to conduct a randomized controlled trial of the Hub versus usual care to test its efficacy to improve the quality of shared decision-making and reduce long-term decisional regret.
A National Survey of Obstetrician/Gynecologists' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs Regarding Adult Human Papillomavirus Vaccination
(Mary Ann Liebert, 2021) Kasting, Monica L.; Head, Katharine J.; DeMaria, Andrea L.; Neuman, Monica K.; Russell, Allissa L.; Robertson, Sharon E.; Rouse, Caroline E.; Zimet, Gregory D.; Communication Studies, School of Liberal Arts
Background: Many women see an obstetrician/gynecologist (OB/GYN) annually and receive their primary care from an OB/GYN. Understanding OB/GYNs' human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination practices, including knowledge of and barriers to vaccination, is essential to design effective interventions to increase vaccination. This study evaluated OB/GYN knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs regarding vaccinating both younger (18-26 years) and mid-adult (27-45 years) women. Materials and Methods: Data were collected from OB/GYN providers in October 2019 through a nationwide web-based survey. Items included the following: HPV-related vaccination practices, recommendation strength, knowledge (seven items), benefits (four items), and barriers (eight items). Results: The sample (n = 224) was majority were White (69%), men (56%), and practice in suburban clinics (55%). Most (84%) reported they usually or always recommend HPV vaccine to eligible patients, but estimated only about half (51%) of other OB/GYNs did the same. Recommendation strength varied by patient age with 84% strongly recommending it to patients ≤18 years, compared with 79% and 25% strongly recommending to younger and mid-adult patients, respectively (p < 0.01). Participants reported lower benefits (p = 0.007) and higher barriers (p < 0.001) for 27- to 45-year-old patients compared with younger patients. Cost was the most frequently reported barrier, regardless of patient age. Overall knowledge was high (m = 5.2/7) but 33% of participants did not know the vaccine was safe while breastfeeding. Conclusions: Although providers reported strongly and consistently recommending the HPV vaccination to their adult patients, there were gaps in knowledge and attitudinal barriers that need to be addressed. Provider performance feedback may be important in improving HPV vaccination awareness among providers.
Acceptance of a Risk Estimation Tool for Colorectal Cancer Screening
(Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research, 2016-04-08) Luckhurst, Cherie; Imperiale, Tom; Matthias, Marianne S.
Abstract: While colonoscopy is the most prevalent screening test for colorectal cancer (CRC), it is often too expensive, too uncomfortable, or too time-consuming for patients. Non-compliance is common. Recently, fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) has become a guideline-recommended alternative. The FIT is a non-invasive, inexpensive method that requires no uncomfortable preparation by patients. The decision to recommend the colonoscopy or the FIT is based on the patient’s estimated risk for CRC. Several countries have created risk prediction tools to help identify patients at high risk for advanced colorectal neoplasia (the combination of CRC and advanced, precancerous polyps). A U.S.-based prediction tool was recently published1 that uses five easily and reliably measured factors (age, sex, a first degree relative with CRC, waist circumference, and cigarette smoking history) to quantify risk. We aimed to learn the impressions of clinicians and patients to this risk estimation tool. In the first phase of this study, we used a semi-structured format to interview clinicians at a VA medical center and a non-VA hospital. Using a paper prototype of the risk estimation tool, we asked about its usefulness to estimate risk and to aid their selection of a CRC screening tool. Using a grounded theory approach, we analyzed the interview transcripts and identified major themes. We found that clinicians thought the tool was clear and easy to use. However, they are unlikely to use it as a decision aid until FIT is more widely-endorsed as an acceptable alternative screening test. In phase two of the study, we will interview patients to assess their responses to the tool.
African factors in cancer control: Perspectives from Inooro TV’s ‘Uria Ndagitari’ – ‘ask the doctor’: A Kenyan vernacular TV health show
(Journal of Communication and Media Research, 2023) Maina, Robert; Mutua, Sylvester-James
Agenda Setting in Psychiatric Consultations: An Exploratory Study
(2013) Frankel, Richard M.; Salyers, Michelle P.; Bonfils, Kelsey; Oles, Sylwia; Matthias, Marianne S.
Are Health Care Professionals Prepared to Implement Human Papillomavirus Testing? A Review of Psychosocial Determinants of Human Papillomavirus Test Acceptability in Primary Cervical Cancer Screening
(Liebert, 2020-03) Tatar, Ovidiu; Wade, Kristina; McBride, Emily; Thompson, Erika; Head, Katharine J.; Perez, Samara; Shapiro, Gilla K.; Waller, Jo; Zimet, Gregory; Rosberger, Zeev; Communication Studies, School of Liberal Arts
Background: Guidelines for cervical cancer screening have been updated to include human papillomavirus (HPV) testing, which is more sensitive compared to cytology in detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Because of its increased sensitivity, a negative HPV test is more reassuring for a woman that she is at low risk for precancerous cervical lesions than a negative Pap test. Prompted by the inadequate translation of HPV test-based screening guidelines into practice, we aimed to synthesize the literature regarding health care providers (HCPs) knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to HPV testing and the influence of psychosocial factors on HCPs acceptability of HPV testing in primary cervical cancer screening. Materials and Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Global Health, and Web of Science for journal articles from January 1, 1980 to July 25, 2018. A narrative synthesis of HCPs knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to HPV testing is provided. Informed by the Patient Pathway framework, we used deductive thematic analysis to synthesize the influence of psychosocial factors on HCPs acceptability of HPV testing. Results: The most important HCP knowledge gaps are related to the superior sensitivity of the HPV test and age-specific guideline recommendations for HPV testing. Thirty to fifty percent of HCPs are not compliant with guideline recommendations for HPV testing, for example, screening at shorter intervals than recommended. Barriers, facilitators, and contradictory evidence of HCPs' acceptability of the HPV test are grouped by category: (1) factors related to the HCP; (2) patient intrinsic factors; (3) factors corresponding to HCP's practice environment; and (4) health care system factors. Conclusions: HCP's adherence to guidelines for HPV testing in cervical cancer screening is suboptimal and could be improved by specialty organizations ensuring consistency across guidelines. Targeted educational interventions to address barriers of HPV test acceptability identified in this review may facilitate the translation of HPV testing recommendations into practice.
Ask the parents: Testing the acceptability and usability of a hypospadias decision aid
(Elsevier, 2022) Binion, Kelsey; Miller, Andrew; Misseri, Rosalia; Kaefer, Martin; Longtin, Krista; Carroll, Aaron; Wiehe, Sarah E.; Chan, Katherine H.; Communication Studies, School of Liberal Arts
Introduction: In previous work, we engaged key stakeholders to create a web-based decision aid (DA) prototype to facilitate shared decision making about hypospadias. Objective: The study's objective was to use a human-centered design approach to assess the DA's acceptability and usability and revise it prior to pilot testing. Methods: We recruited English-speaking parents (≥18 years old) of sons with hypospadias (≤5 years) for a two-phase process of semi-structured phone/video interviews to obtain feedback about our DA prototype. DA webpages included: "Hypospadias," "Surgery Basics," "No Surgery," "Family Stories," "Help Me Decide," and "FAQs." In both phases, participants viewed the DA using the "think aloud" technique and completed several validated scales to evaluate its acceptability and usability. In phase 1, we collected feedback about the "Homepage" organization, values clarification methods (VCM), and webpage content. In phase 2, participants searched the DA for answers to hypospadias-related questions, provided feedback on testimonial videos and VCM, and shared their preferences about data visualizations. All interviews were audio recorded. After each phase, transcripts were qualitatively analyzed to identify key areas for revision. Revisions were made between phase 1 and 2 to improve the DA's acceptability and usability. Results: We interviewed 20 participants (10/phase): median age 33.7 years, 60% female, 80% White. Mean score on the Preparation for Decision Making Scale: 86.8 (out of 100). We revised: 1) VCM, focusing on pros/cons of surgery and question prompts, 2) "Homepage," adding webpage descriptions (Extended Summary Figure), 3) menu organization, 4) "Surgery Day" webpage, adding general anesthesia risk information, and 5) "Hypospadias" webpage, adding an icon bar graph to help participants visualize statistics. Participants thought the testimonial videos were relatable and the VCMs would prepare them for their visit with their child's urologist. Discussion: Ours is the first parent-centered DA developed and pre-tested for hypospadias. Using validated usability and acceptability scales, participants highly rated the DA in helping them arrive at a decision about surgery. Study limitations include the sample's lack of diversity (i.e., educated, health literate) and participants already decided about their son's hypospadias management before enrolling. To learn more about the DA's usability and acceptability, we plan to pilot test it in a clinical setting. Conclusions: Participants found our DA informative in understanding hypospadias. There was a high perceived level of preparation for hypospadias decision making. Participatory research methods, such as "think aloud," may be helpful when testing DAs as they privilege the patient's experience.
Association between patient characteristics and HPV vaccination recommendation for postpartum patients: A national survey of Obstetrician/Gynecologists
(Elsevier, 2022-04-20) Lake, Paige W.; Head, Katharine J.; Christy, Shannon M.; DeMaria, Andrea L.; Thompson, Erika L.; Vadaparampil, Susan T.; Zimet, Gregory D.; Kasting, Monica L.; Communication Studies, School of Liberal Arts
Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination rates in the U.S. are relatively low. Provider recommendation rates for HPV vaccination often vary by patient age and relationship status. Obstetrician/gynecologists (OB/GYNs) represent a key provider group that can recommend the HPV vaccine. This study examined differences in OB/GYN recommendation of HPV vaccination for inpatient postpartum patients by age, parity, and marital status. Data were collected from OB/GYNs nationally via a cross-sectional survey. Participants were randomized to two vignette groups (23-year-old patient or 33-year-old patient). Within each group, participants received 4 vignettes that were identical except for patient marital status (married/not in a committed relationship) and number of children (first/third child), and were asked to indicate HPV vaccination recommendation likelihood on a scale of 0 (definitely would not) to 100 (definitely would). A 2 × 2 × 2 general linear model with repeated measures was used to examine main and interaction effects of patient age, relationship status, and parity. 207 OB/GYNs were included in the final analyses. Recommendation was high for 23-year-old patients (range: 64.5-84.6 out of 100). When marital status and parity were held constant, recommendation likelihood was higher for the younger vs. older patient and was also higher for patients not in a committed relationship, compared to married patients (all p-values < 0.001). Differences in recommendation exist when considering age and relationship status, which provides insight into OB/GYN clinical decision-making. Findings highlight the need to address barriers to HPV vaccination recommendation, including awareness of risk factors to consider when recommending the vaccine.
Barriers to guideline-concordant antibiotic use among inpatient physicians: A case vignette qualitative study
(Wiley, 2016-03) Livorsi, D.; Comer, Amber R.; Matthias, Marianne S.; Perencevich, E.N.; Bair, M.J.; Department of Communication Studies, School of Liberal Arts
BACKGROUND: Greater adherence to antibiotic-prescribing guidelines may promote more judicious antibiotic use, which could benefit individual patients and society at large. OBJECTIVE: To assess physician knowledge and acceptance of antibiotic-prescribing guidelines through the use of case vignettes. DESIGN: We conducted semistructured interviews with 30 inpatient physicians. Participants were asked to respond to 3 hypothetical case vignettes: (1) a skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI), (2) suspected hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), and (3) asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB). All participants received feedback according to guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and were asked to discuss their level of comfort with following these guidelines. SETTING: Two acute care teaching hospitals for adult patients. INTERVENTION: None. MEASUREMENTS: Data from transcribed interviews were analyzed using emergent thematic analysis. RESULTS: Participants were receptive to guidelines and believed they were useful. However, participants' responses to the case vignettes demonstrated that IDSA guideline recommendations were not routinely followed for SSTI, HAP, and ASB. We identified 3 barriers to guideline-concordant care: (1) physicians' lack of awareness of specific guideline recommendations; (2) tension between adhering to guidelines and the desire to individualize patient care; and (3) skepticism of certain guideline recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Case vignettes may be useful tools to assess physician knowledge and acceptance of antibiotic-prescribing guidelines. Using case vignettes, we identified 3 barriers to following IDSA guidelines. Efforts to improve guideline-concordant antibiotic prescribing should focus on reducing such barriers at the local level.

Browse

Browsing Department of Communication Studies Works by Title

Results Per Page

Sort Options