Sunil Badve

Permanent URI for this collection

https://hdl.handle.net/1805/6682

Sunil Badve's translational research efforts on efficient treatment of breast cancer have a two-pronged approach; developing novel targeted therapies on the one hand and identifying ineffective therapies on the other. His team is studying the individual biological components that culminate in cancer. Gaining a better understanding of these molecular mechanisms will enable identification of key "nodes" in cellular pathways, which can then be targeted by biological agents leading to better diagnosis and effective treatment of breast cancer.

Dr. Badve demonstrated that the FoxA1 protein plays a critical role in determining responses to anti-hormonal therapy IU patent, being licensed. His group has developed a gene signature useful for predicting brain metastasis (IU patent pending) and is currently, with (IU and non-IU) collaborators, trying to dissect the pathways associated with brain metastasis with the hope of preventing and treating this disease. He is also collaborating with IU and Purdue researchers to develop novel methods of detecting and treating breast cancer.

Dr. Badve's practical application of research into information that can be used by local clinicians in treating breast cancer is another example of how IUPUI's faculty members are TRANSLATING their RESEARCH INTO PRACTICE.

Browse

Browsing Sunil Badve by Author "Albain, Kathy S."

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Adjuvant Chemotherapy Guided by a 21-Gene Expression Assay in Breast Cancer
    (Massachusetts Medical Society, 2018-07) Sparano, Joseph A.; Gray, Robert J.; Makower, Della F.; Pritchard, Kathleen I.; Albain, Kathy S.; Hayes, Daniel F.; Geyer, Charles E., Jr.; Dees, Elizabeth C.; Goetz, Matthew P.; Olson, John A., Jr.; Lively, Tracy; Badve, Sunil S.; Saphner, Thomas J.; Wagner, Lynne I.; Whelan, Timothy J.; Ellis, Matthew J.; Paik, Soonmyung; Wood, William C.; Ravdin, Peter M.; Keane, Maccon M.; Gomez Moreno, Henry L.; Reddy, Pavan S.; Goggins, Timothy F.; Mayer, Ingrid A.; Brufsky, Adam M.; Toppmeyer, Deborah L.; Kaklamani, Virginia G.; Berenberg, Jeffery L.; Abrams, Jeffrey; Sledge, George W., Jr.; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine
    BACKGROUND The recurrence score based on the 21-gene breast cancer assay predicts chemotherapy benefit if it is high and a low risk of recurrence in the absence of chemotherapy if it is low; however, there is uncertainty about the benefit of chemotherapy for most patients, who have a midrange score. METHODS We performed a prospective trial involving 10,273 women with hormone-receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–negative, axillary node–negative breast cancer. Of the 9719 eligible patients with follow-up information, 6711 (69%) had a midrange recurrence score of 11 to 25 and were randomly assigned to receive either chemoendocrine therapy or endocrine therapy alone. The trial was designed to show noninferiority of endocrine therapy alone for invasive disease–free survival (defined as freedom from invasive disease recurrence, second primary cancer, or death). RESULTS Endocrine therapy was noninferior to chemoendocrine therapy in the analysis of invasive disease–free survival (hazard ratio for invasive disease recurrence, second primary cancer, or death [endocrine vs. chemoendocrine therapy], 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.94 to 1.24; P=0.26). At 9 years, the two treatment groups had similar rates of invasive disease–free survival (83.3% in the endocrine-therapy group and 84.3% in the chemoendocrine-therapy group), freedom from disease recurrence at a distant site (94.5% and 95.0%) or at a distant or local–regional site (92.2% and 92.9%), and overall survival (93.9% and 93.8%). The chemotherapy benefit for invasive disease–free survival varied with the combination of recurrence score and age (P=0.004), with some benefit of chemotherapy found in women 50 years of age or younger with a recurrence score of 16 to 25. CONCLUSIONS Adjuvant endocrine therapy and chemoendocrine therapy had similar efficacy in women with hormone-receptor–positive, HER2-negative, axillary node–negative breast cancer who had a midrange 21-gene recurrence score, although some benefit of chemotherapy was found in some women 50 years of age or younger.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Clinical and Genomic Risk to Guide the Use of Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer
    (Massachusetts Medical Society, 2019-06-20) Sparano, Joseph A.; Gray, Robert J.; Ravdin, Peter M.; Makower, Della F.; Pritchard, Kathleen I.; Albain, Kathy S.; Hayes, Daniel F.; Geyer, Charles E.; Dees, Elizabeth C.; Goetz, Matthew P.; Olson, John A.; Lively, Tracy; Badve, Sunil S.; Saphner, Thomas J.; Wagner, Lynne I.; Whelan, Timothy J.; Ellis, Matthew J.; Paik, Soonmyung; Wood, William C.; Keane, Maccon M.; Gomez Moreno, Henry L.; Reddy, Pavan S.; Goggins, Timothy F.; Mayer, Ingrid A.; Brufsky, Adam M.; Toppmeyer, Deborah L.; Kaklamani, Virginia G.; Berenberg, Jeffrey L.; Abrams, Jeffrey; Sledge, George W.; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine
    BACKGROUND The use of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer may be guided by clinicopathological factors and a score based on a 21-gene assay to determine the risk of recurrence. Whether the level of clinical risk of breast cancer recurrence adds prognostic information to the recurrence score is not known. METHODS We performed a prospective trial involving 9427 women with hormone-receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative, axillary node–negative breast cancer, in whom an assay of 21 genes had been performed, and we classified the clinical risk of recurrence of breast cancer as low or high on the basis of the tumor size and histologic grade. The effect of clinical risk was evaluated by calculating hazard ratios for distant recurrence with the use of Cox proportional-hazards models. The initial endocrine therapy was tamoxifen alone in the majority of the premenopausal women who were 50 years of age or younger. RESULTS The level of clinical risk was prognostic of distant recurrence in women with an intermediate 21-gene recurrence score of 11 to 25 (on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a worse prognosis or a greater potential benefit from chemotherapy) who were randomly assigned to endocrine therapy (hazard ratio for the comparison of high vs. low clinical risk, 2.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.93 to 3.87) or to chemotherapy plus endocrine (chemoendocrine) therapy (hazard ratio, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.66 to 3.48) and in women with a high recurrence score (a score of 26 to 100), all of whom were assigned to chemoendocrine therapy (hazard ratio, 3.17; 95% CI, 1.94 to 5.19). Among women who were 50 years of age or younger who had received endocrine therapy alone, the estimated (±SE) rate of distant recurrence at 9 years was less than 5% (≤1.8±0.9%) with a low recurrence score (a score of 0 to 10), irrespective of clinical risk, and 4.7±1.0% with an intermediate recurrence score and low clinical risk. In this age group, the estimated distant recurrence at 9 years exceeded 10% among women with a high clinical risk and an intermediate recurrence score who received endocrine therapy alone (12.3±2.4%) and among those with a high recurrence score who received chemoendocrine therapy (15.2±3.3%). CONCLUSIONS Clinical-risk stratification provided prognostic information that, when added to the 21-gene recurrence score, could be used to identify premenopausal women who could benefit from more effective therapy.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Prospective Validation of a 21-Gene Expression Assay in Breast Cancer
    (Massachusetts Medical Society, 2015-11) Sparano, Joseph A.; Gray, Robert J.; Makower, Della F.; Pritchard, Kathleen I.; Albain, Kathy S.; Hayes, Daniel F.; Geyer, Charles E., Jr.; Dees, Elizabeth C.; Perez, Edith A.; Olson, John A., Jr.; Zujewski, JoAnne; Lively, Tracy; Badve, Sunil S.; Saphner, Thomas J.; Wagner, Lynne I.; Whelan, Timothy J.; Ellis, Matthew J.; Paik, Soonmyung; Wood, William C.; Ravdin, Peter; Keane, Maccon M.; Gomez Moreno, Henry L.; Reddy, Pavan S.; Goggins, Timothy F.; Mayer, Ingrid A.; Brufsky, Adam M.; Toppmeyer, Deborah L.; Kaklamani, Virginia G.; Atkins, James N.; Berenberg, Jeffrey L.; Sledge, George W.; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine
    BACKGROUND Prior studies with the use of a prospective–retrospective design including archival tumor samples have shown that gene-expression assays provide clinically useful prognostic information. However, a prospectively conducted study in a uniformly treated population provides the highest level of evidence supporting the clinical validity and usefulness of a biomarker. METHODS We performed a prospective trial involving women with hormone-receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2)–negative, axillary node–negative breast cancer with tumors of 1.1 to 5.0 cm in the greatest dimension (or 0.6 to 1.0 cm in the greatest dimension and intermediate or high tumor grade) who met established guidelines for the consideration of adjuvant chemotherapy on the basis of clinicopathologic features. A reverse-transcriptase–polymerase-chain-reaction assay of 21 genes was performed on the paraffin-embedded tumor tissue, and the results were used to calculate a score indicating the risk of breast-cancer recurrence; patients were assigned to receive endocrine therapy without chemotherapy if they had a recurrence score of 0 to 10, indicating a very low risk of recurrence (on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a greater risk of recurrence). RESULTS Of the 10,253 eligible women enrolled, 1626 women (15.9%) who had a recurrence score of 0 to 10 were assigned to receive endocrine therapy alone without chemotherapy. At 5 years, in this patient population, the rate of invasive disease–free survival was 93.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 92.4 to 94.9), the rate of freedom from recurrence of breast cancer at a distant site was 99.3% (95% CI, 98.7 to 99.6), the rate of freedom from recurrence of breast cancer at a distant or local–regional site was 98.7% (95% CI, 97.9 to 99.2), and the rate of overall survival was 98.0% (95% CI, 97.1 to 98.6). CONCLUSIONS Among patients with hormone-receptor–positive, HER2-negative, axillary node–negative breast cancer who met established guidelines for the recommendation of adjuvant chemotherapy on the basis of clinicopathologic features, those with tumors that had a favorable gene-expression profile had very low rates of recurrence at 5 years with endocrine therapy alone.