Celiac disease in North America: What is the current practice of pediatric gastroenterology providers?

dc.contributor.authorSingh, Arunjot
dc.contributor.authorSilvester, Jocelyn
dc.contributor.authorTurner, Justine
dc.contributor.authorAbsah, Imad
dc.contributor.authorSparks, Brandon A.
dc.contributor.authorWalsh, Catharine M.
dc.contributor.authorBracken, Julia M.
dc.contributor.authorStanisz, Joanna
dc.contributor.authorHajjat, Temara
dc.contributor.authorBadalyan, Vahe
dc.contributor.authorChugh, Ankur
dc.contributor.authorHoffenberg, Edward J.
dc.contributor.authorDowhaniuk, Jenna K.
dc.contributor.departmentPediatrics, School of Medicine
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-10T10:55:02Z
dc.date.available2024-10-10T10:55:02Z
dc.date.issued2024-05-27
dc.description.abstractObjectives: While guidelines exist for the diagnosis and management of pediatric celiac disease (CeD), current practices in North America are not well-described. This study aimed to explore current practice patterns to identify gaps and direct future clinical, training and research initiatives. Methods: A 23-item survey designed by the Celiac Disease Special Interest Group was distributed electronically to its members. Questions explored four themes: (1) screening and diagnosis pre and post the coronavirus disease (COVID)-19 pandemic, (2) treatment and monitoring, (3) family screening and transition of care, and (4) CeD focused training. Results: The survey response rate was 10.8% (278/2552). Most respondents were from the United States (89.9%, n = 250) and Canada (8.6%, n = 24). While endoscopy remained the gold standard, serology-based diagnosis was accepted by 47.5% (132/278). In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, 37.4% of providers changed their diagnostic practice. Barriers to care included: lack of insurance coverage for dietitians, wait times, and lack of CeD focused training. During fellowship 69.1% (192/278) reported no focused CeD training. Conclusion: Survey results revealed practice variation regarding the diagnosis and management of CeD in North America including a substantial proportion accepting non-biopsy, serology-based diagnosis, which increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. Variations in screening, diagnosis, interval surveillance, and family screening were also identified. Dedicated CeD education in pediatric gastroenterology fellowship may be an opportunity for standardizing practice and advancing research. Future North American guidelines should take current care patterns into consideration and develop new initiatives to improve care of children with CeD.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.identifier.citationSingh A, Silvester J, Turner J, et al. Celiac disease in North America: What is the current practice of pediatric gastroenterology providers?. JPGN Rep. 2024;5(3):276-283. Published 2024 May 27. doi:10.1002/jpr3.12087
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/43872
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherWolters Kluwer
dc.relation.isversionof10.1002/jpr3.12087
dc.relation.journalJPGN Reports
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.sourcePMC
dc.subjectClinical practice
dc.subjectEndoscopy
dc.subjectTraining
dc.titleCeliac disease in North America: What is the current practice of pediatric gastroenterology providers?
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Singh2024Celiac-CCBYNCND.pdf
Size:
761.68 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.04 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: