Effect of resistance training on physical function during chemotherapy in colon cancer

dc.contributor.authorBrown, Justin C.
dc.contributor.authorYang, Shengping
dc.contributor.authorCompton, Stephanie L. E.
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Kristin L.
dc.contributor.authorCespedes Feliciano, Elizabeth M.
dc.contributor.authorQuinney, Sara
dc.contributor.authorSternfeld, Barbara
dc.contributor.authorCaan, Bette J.
dc.contributor.authorMeyerhardt, Jeffrey A.
dc.contributor.authorSchmitz, Kathryn H.
dc.contributor.departmentObstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-18T13:18:20Z
dc.date.available2024-09-18T13:18:20Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractBackground: The decline of physical function during chemotherapy predicts poor quality of life and premature death. It is unknown if resistance training prevents physical function decline during chemotherapy in colon cancer survivors. Methods: This multicenter trial randomly assigned 181 colon cancer survivors receiving postoperative chemotherapy to home-based resistance training or usual care control. Physical function outcomes included the short physical performance battery, isometric handgrip strength, and the physical function subscale of the Medical Outcomes Short-Form 36-item questionnaire. Mixed models for repeated measures quantified estimated treatment differences. Results: At baseline, participants had a mean (SD) age of 55.2 (12.8) years; 67 (37%) were 60 years or older, and 29 (16%) had a composite short physical performance battery score of no more than 9. Compared with usual care control, resistance training did not improve the composite short physical performance battery score (estimated treatment difference = -0.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.32 to 0.31; P = .98) or the short physical performance battery scores for balance (estimated treatment difference = 0.01, 95% CI = -0.10 to 0.11; P = .93), gait speed (estimated treatment difference = 0.08, 95% CI = -0.06 to 0.22; P = .28), and sit-to-stand (estimated treatment difference = -0.08, 95% CI = -0.29 to 0.13; P = .46). Compared with usual care control, resistance training did not improve isometric handgrip strength (estimated treatment difference = 1.50 kg, 95% CI = -1.06 to 4.05; P = .25) or self-reported physical function (estimated treatment difference = -3.55, 95% CI = -10.03 to 2.94); P = .28). The baseline short physical performance battery balance score (r = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.07 to 0.35) and handgrip strength (r = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.09 to 0.36) correlated with chemotherapy relative dose intensity. Conclusion: Among colon cancer survivors with relatively high physical functioning, random assignment to home-based resistance training did not prevent physical function decline during chemotherapy.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.identifier.citationBrown JC, Yang S, Compton SLE, et al. Effect of resistance training on physical function during chemotherapy in colon cancer. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2024;8(4):pkae058. doi:10.1093/jncics/pkae058
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/43402
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Press
dc.relation.isversionof10.1093/jncics/pkae058
dc.relation.journalJNCI Cancer Spectrum
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourcePMC
dc.subjectColonic neoplasms
dc.subjectHand strength
dc.subjectPhysical functional performance
dc.subjectResistance training
dc.subjectWalking speed
dc.titleEffect of resistance training on physical function during chemotherapy in colon cancer
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Brown2024Effect-CCBY.pdf
Size:
1.2 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.04 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: