International Expert Consensus on Instrument-Assisted Soft-Tissue Mobilization Precautions and Contraindications: A Modified Delphi Study

Abstract

Background: Instrument-assisted soft-tissue mobilization (IASTM) is a popular myofascial intervention used by healthcare professionals. Despite the growing body of research evidence, there is still a gap in understanding what healthcare professionals consider as treatment precautions or contraindications. To date, no consensus on precautions and contraindications has been established among IASTM experts. The purpose of this modified Delphi survey was to determine IASTM precautions and contraindications among international IASTM experts. Methods: A three-round Delphi study of 24 international IASTM experts was conducted. In round 1, experts chose from a list of 81 medical conditions and treatment considerations that could be a concern for IASTM treatment. Consensus was considered if more than 70% of experts agreed on an item. Round 2 included the updated list of 39 items, and the experts decided if each item should be a precaution, contraindication, or both. The strength of agreement grade scale was used to rank the precautions and contraindications, by the level of expert agreement using grades A-D (e.g., A-strong, B-moderate, C-weak, D-both). Grade D conditions could potentially be both a precaution and contraindication. In round 3, the final list of categories and items was presented to the experts for final approval. Results: All recruited experts (n = 24) participated in the three rounds and the final list of items received 100% approval. Contraindications had the highest number of conditions (n = 16) across the strength of agreement grade categories A-C followed by category D (both) (n = 8). Discussion: This Delphi study was the first survey to document expert consensus on precautions and contraindications based upon the strength of agreement. This study offers a beginner's guide for clinicians to safely implement IASTM by establishing required precautions and contraindications through consensus agreement. Conclusions: This survey should be the first step in a series of planned IASTM studies on precautions and contraindications to establish the best-practice recommendations for the application of IASTM in clinical practice.