Can we predict orthodontic extraction patterns by using machine learning?

dc.contributor.authorLeavitt, Landon
dc.contributor.authorVolovic, James
dc.contributor.authorSteinhauer, Lily
dc.contributor.authorMason, Taylor
dc.contributor.authorEckert, George
dc.contributor.authorDean, Jeffrey A.
dc.contributor.authorDundar, M. Murat
dc.contributor.authorTurkkahraman, Hakan
dc.contributor.departmentOrthodontics and Oral Facial Genetics, School of Dentistryen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-13T20:12:04Z
dc.date.available2023-06-13T20:12:04Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractObjective To investigate the utility of machine learning (ML) in accurately predicting orthodontic extraction patterns in a heterogeneous population. Materials and Methods The material of this retrospective study consisted of records of 366 patients treated with orthodontic extractions. The dataset was randomly split into training (70%) and test sets (30%) and was stratified according to race/ethnicity and gender. Fifty-five cephalometric and demographic input data were used to train and test multiple ML algorithms. The extraction patterns were labelled according to the previous treatment plan. Random Forest (RF), Logistic Regression (LR), and Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithms were used to predict the patient's extraction patterns. Results The highest class accuracy percentages were obtained for the upper and lower 1st premolars (U/L4s) (RF: 81.63%, LR: 63.27%, SVM: 63.27%) and upper 1st premolars only (U4s) extraction patterns (RF: 61.11%, LR: 72.22%, SVM: 72.22%). However, all methods revealed low class accuracy rates (<50%) for the upper 1st and lower 2nd premolars (U4/L5s), upper 2nd and lower 1st premolars (U5/L4s), and upper and lower 2nd premolars (U/L5s) extraction patterns. For the overall accuracy, RF yielded the highest percentage with 54.55%, followed by SVM with 52.73% and LR with 49.09%. Conclusion All tested supervised ML techniques yielded good accuracy in predicting U/L4s and U4s extraction patterns. However, they predicted poorly for the U4/L5s, U5/L4s, and U/L5s extraction patterns. Molar relationship, mandibular crowding, and overjet were found to be the most predictive indicators for determining extraction patterns.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationLeavitt, L., Volovic, J., Steinhauer, L., Mason, T., Eckert, G., Dean, J. A., Dundar, M. M., & Turkkahraman, H. (2023). Can we predict orthodontic extraction patterns by using machine learning? Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12641en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/33736
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1111/ocr.12641en_US
dc.relation.journalOrthodontics & Craniofacial Researchen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourcePublisheren_US
dc.subjectclinical decision-makingen_US
dc.subjectmachine learningen_US
dc.subjectorthodontic extractionen_US
dc.titleCan we predict orthodontic extraction patterns by using machine learning?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Leavitt2023CanWe-CCBYNCND.pdf
Size:
4 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: