Circulating Tumor DNA Testing for Homology Recombination Repair Genes in Prostate Cancer: From the Lab to the Clinic

dc.contributor.authorCimadamore, Alessia
dc.contributor.authorCheng, Liang
dc.contributor.authorMassari, Francesco
dc.contributor.authorSantoni, Matteo
dc.contributor.authorPepi, Laura
dc.contributor.authorFranzese, Carmine
dc.contributor.authorScarpelli, Marina
dc.contributor.authorLopez-Beltran, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorBenedetto Galosi, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorMontironi, Rodolfo
dc.contributor.departmentPathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-09T16:36:02Z
dc.date.available2022-12-09T16:36:02Z
dc.date.issued2021-05-24
dc.description.abstractApproximately 23% of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancers (mCRPC) harbor deleterious aberrations in DNA repair genes. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi) therapy has shown improvements in overall survival in patients with mCRPC who harbor somatic and/or germline alterations of homology recombination repair (HRR) genes. Peripheral blood samples are typically used for the germline mutation analysis test using the DNA extracted from peripheral blood leucocytes. Somatic alterations can be assessed by extracting DNA from a tumor tissue sample or using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) extracted from a plasma sample. Each of these genetic tests has its own benefits and limitations. The main advantages compared to the tissue test are that liquid biopsy is a non-invasive and easily repeatable test with the value of better representing tumor heterogeneity than primary biopsy and of capturing changes and/or resistance mutations in the genetic tumor profile during disease progression. Furthermore, ctDNA can inform about mutation status and guide treatment options in patients with mCRPC. Clinical validation and test implementation into routine clinical practice are currently very limited. In this review, we discuss the state of the art of the ctDNA test in prostate cancer compared to blood and tissue testing. We also illustrate the ctDNA testing workflow, the available techniques for ctDNA extraction, sequencing, and analysis, describing advantages and limits of each techniques.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationCimadamore A, Cheng L, Massari F, et al. Circulating Tumor DNA Testing for Homology Recombination Repair Genes in Prostate Cancer: From the Lab to the Clinic. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(11):5522. Published 2021 May 24. doi:10.3390/ijms22115522en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/30711
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.3390/ijms22115522en_US
dc.relation.journalInternational Journal of Molecular Sciencesen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectCirculating tumor DNAen_US
dc.subjectProstate canceren_US
dc.subjectMetastatic castration-resistant prostate canceren_US
dc.subjectHomology recombination repair genesen_US
dc.subjectPARP inhibitorsen_US
dc.titleCirculating Tumor DNA Testing for Homology Recombination Repair Genes in Prostate Cancer: From the Lab to the Clinicen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ijms-22-05522.pdf
Size:
642.84 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: