In situ evaluation of fluoride-, stannous- and polyphosphate-containing solutions against enamel erosion

dc.contributor.authorJoão-Souza, Samira Helena
dc.contributor.authorBezerra, Sávio José C.
dc.contributor.authorde Freitas, Patricia Moreira
dc.contributor.authorde Lima, Nelson B.
dc.contributor.authorCorrêa Aranha, Ana Cecilia
dc.contributor.authorHara, Anderson T.
dc.contributor.authorScaramucci, Taís
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Cariology, Operative Dentistry and Dental Public Health, School of Dentistryen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-21T19:41:20Z
dc.date.available2017-06-21T19:41:20Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractObjective To evaluate the anti-erosive effect of solutions containing sodium fluoride (F: 225 ppm of fluoride), sodium fluoride + stannous chloride (F + Sn: 225 ppm of fluoride + 800 ppm of stannous), sodium fluoride + stannous chloride + sodium linear polyphosphate (F + Sn + LPP: 225 ppm of fluoride + 800 ppm of stannous + 2% of sodium linear polyphosphate), and deionized water (C: control), using a four-phase, single-blind, crossover in situ clinical trial. Methods In each phase, 12 volunteers wore appliances containing 4 enamel specimens, which were submitted to a 5-day erosion-remineralization phase that consisted of 2 h of salivary pellicle formation with the appliance in situ, followed by 2 min extra-oral immersion in 1% citric acid (pH 2.4), 6x/day, with 90 min of exposure to saliva in situ between the challenges. Treatment with the test solutions was performed extra-orally for 2 min, 2x/day. At the end of the experiment, surface loss (SL, in μm) was evaluated by optical profilometry. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey tests (α = 0.05). The surface of additional specimens was evaluated by x-ray diffraction after treatments (n = 3). Results C (mean SL ± standard-deviation: 5.97 ± 1.70) and F (5.36 ± 1.59) showed the highest SL, with no significant difference between them (p > 0.05). F + Sn (2.68 ± 1.62) and F + Sn + LPP (2.10 ± 0.95) did not differ from each other (p > 0.05), but presented lower SL than the other groups (P < 0.05). Apatite and stannous deposits on specimen surfaces were identified in the x-ray analysis for F + Sn and F + Sn + LPP. Conclusions Sodium fluoride solution exhibited no significant anti-erosive effect. The combination between sodium fluoride and stannous chloride reduced enamel erosion, irrespective of the presence of linear sodium polyphosphate. Clinical significance Under highly erosive conditions, sodium fluoride rinse may not be a suitable alternative to prevent enamel erosion. A rinse containing sodium fluoride and stannous chloride was shown to be a better treatment option, which was not further improved by addition of the sodium linear polyphosphate.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationJoão-Souza, S. H., Bezerra, S. J. C., de Freitas, P. M., de Lima, N. B., Aranha, A. C. C., Hara, A. T., & Scaramucci, T. (2017). In situ evaluation of fluoride-, stannous- and polyphosphate-containing solutions against enamel erosion. Journal of Dentistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.05.014en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/13157
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.jdent.2017.05.014en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Dentistryen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourceAuthoren_US
dc.subjectenamelen_US
dc.subjecterosionen_US
dc.subjectfluorideen_US
dc.titleIn situ evaluation of fluoride-, stannous- and polyphosphate-containing solutions against enamel erosionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Joao-Souza_2017_In-situ.pdf
Size:
438.29 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.88 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: