Getting Under the Skin of Clinical Inertia in Insulin Initiation: The Translating Research Into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD) Insulin Starts Project

dc.contributor.authorRatanawongsa, Neda
dc.contributor.authorCrosson, Jesse C.
dc.contributor.authorSchillinger, Dean
dc.contributor.authorKarter, Andrew J.
dc.contributor.authorSaha, Chandan K.
dc.contributor.authorMarrero, David G.
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-04T16:20:50Z
dc.date.available2013-09-04T16:20:50Z
dc.date.issued2012-01
dc.description.abstractPurpose The purpose of this cross-sectional study is to explore primary care providers’ (PCPs) perceptions about barriers to initiating insulin among patients. Studies suggest that many patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes do not receive insulin initiation by PCPs. Methods As part of the Translating Research Into Action for Diabetes study, the authors conducted structured interviews in health systems in Indiana, New Jersey, and California, asking PCPs about the importance of insulin initiation and factors affecting this decision. The authors calculated proportions choosing each multiple-choice response option and listed the most frequently offered open-ended response categories. Results Among 83 PCPs, 45% were women; 60% were white; and they averaged 13.4 years in practice. Four-fifths of PCPs endorsed guideline-concordant glycemic targets, but 54% individualized targets based on patient age, life expectancy, medical comorbidities, self-management capacity, and willingness. Most (64%) reported that many patients were resistant to new oral or insulin therapies due to fears about the therapy and what it meant about their disease progression. Two-thirds (64%) cited patient resistance as a barrier to insulin initiation, and 43% cited problems with patient self-management, including cognitive or mental health issues, dexterity, or ability to adhere. Eighty percent felt that patient nonadherence would dissuade them from initiating insulin at least some of the time. Conclusions PCPs perceived that patient resistance and poor self- management skills were significant barriers to initiating insulin. Future studies should investigate whether systems-level interventions to improve patient-provider communication about insulin and enhance providers’ perceptions of patient self-management capacity can increase guideline-concordant, patient-centered insulin initiation.en_US
dc.identifier.citationRatanawongsa, N., Crosson, J. C., Schillinger, D., Karter, A. J., Saha, C. K., & Marrero, D. G. (2012). Getting Under the Skin of Clinical Inertia in Insulin Initiation The Translating Research Into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD) Insulin Starts Project. The Diabetes Educator, 38(1), 94-100.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/3511
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectdiabetesen_US
dc.subjectinsulin therapyen_US
dc.subjectclinical inertiaen_US
dc.subjectclinical decision-makingen_US
dc.titleGetting Under the Skin of Clinical Inertia in Insulin Initiation: The Translating Research Into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD) Insulin Starts Projecten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ratanawongsa-2012-getting.pdf
Size:
45.76 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.88 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: