Comparison of Xpert® HPV and Hybrid Capture® 2 DNA Test™ for detection of high-risk HPV infection in cervical atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance

If you need an accessible version of this item, please email your request to digschol@iu.edu so that they may create one and provide it to you.
Date
2017-03
Language
English
Embargo Lift Date
Committee Members
Degree
Degree Year
Department
Grantor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Found At
Elsevier
Abstract

This study compares Xpert® HPV and Hybrid Capture® 2 High-Risk HPV DNA Test™ (hc2) for the detection of high-risk HPV infection in cervical smears. Papanicolaou smears with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) constituted the study specimens. Of the 168 ASC-US samples, 134 (79.8%) were from Saudi patients. The hc2 test was positive in 33 (19.6%) of the total patients, 20% among Saudi patients, and 17.6% among non-Saudi patients. Xpert® HPV produced positive results in 30 (17.8%) of the samples. The overall concordance rate between the two tests was 98.2%, and the positive concordance rate was 91%. There were three samples tested positive by hc2 that tested negative by Xpert® HPV. HPV 16, HPV 18/45 and HPV other types were the most common types. Both tests have a reasonable positive concordance rate, although hc2 detected more cases than Xpert® HPV. Xpert® HPV provides a viable alternative to the hc2 test with similar detection results for samples with ASC-US.

Description
item.page.description.tableofcontents
item.page.relation.haspart
Cite As
Rabaan, A. A., Taylor, D. R., Dawamneh, M. F., & Al-Tawfiq, J. A. (2017). Comparison of Xpert® HPV and Hybrid Capture® 2 DNA Test™ for detection of high-risk HPV infection in cervical atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Journal of infection and public health, 10(2), 219-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2016.04.017
ISSN
Publisher
Series/Report
Sponsorship
Major
Extent
Identifier
Relation
Journal
Journal of Infection and Public Health
Source
Publisher
Alternative Title
Type
Article
Number
Volume
Conference Dates
Conference Host
Conference Location
Conference Name
Conference Panel
Conference Secretariat Location
Version
Final published version
Full Text Available at
This item is under embargo {{howLong}}