Impact of the acuity circle model for liver allocation on multivisceral transplant candidates

dc.contributor.authorIvanics , Tommy
dc.contributor.authorVianna , Rodrigo
dc.contributor.authorKubal , Chandrashekhar A.
dc.contributor.authorIyer , Kishore R.
dc.contributor.authorMazariegos , George V.
dc.contributor.authorMatsumoto , Cal S.
dc.contributor.authorMangus , Richard
dc.contributor.authorBeduschi, Thiago
dc.contributor.authorAbouljoud , Marwan
dc.contributor.authorFridell , Jonathan A.
dc.contributor.authorNagai, Shunji
dc.contributor.departmentSurgery, School of Medicine
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-21T15:42:17Z
dc.date.available2024-06-21T15:42:17Z
dc.date.issued2022-02
dc.description.abstractLiver allocation was updated on February 4, 2020, replacing a Donor Service Area (DSA) with acuity circles (AC). The impact on waitlist outcomes for patients listed for combined liver-intestine transplantation (multivisceral transplantation [MVT]) remains unknown. The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing database was used to identify all candidates listed for both liver and intestine between January 1, 2018 and March 5, 2021. Two eras were defined: pre-AC (2018–2020) and post-AC (2020–2021). Outcomes included 90-day waitlist mortality and transplant probability. A total of 127 adult and 104 pediatric MVT listings were identified. In adults, the 90-day waitlist mortality was not statistically significantly different, but transplant probability was lower post-AC. After risk-adjustment, post-AC was associated with a higher albeit not statistically significantly different mortality hazard (sub-distribution hazard ratio[sHR]: 8.45, 95% CI: 0.96–74.05; p = .054), but a significantly lower transplant probability (sHR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.15–0.75; p = .008). For pediatric patients, waitlist mortality and transplant probability were similar between eras. The proportion of patients who underwent transplant with exception points was lower post-AC both in adult (44% to 9%; p = .04) and pediatric recipients (65% to 15%; p = .002). A lower transplant probability observed in adults listed for MVT may ultimately result in increased waitlist mortality. Efforts should be taken to ensure equitable organ allocation in this vulnerable patient population.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.identifier.citationIvanics, T., Vianna, R., Kubal, C. A., Iyer, K. R., Mazariegos, G. V., Matsumoto, C. S., Mangus, R., Beduschi, T., Abouljoud, M., Fridell, J. A., & Nagai, S. (2022). Impact of the acuity circle model for liver allocation on multivisceral transplant candidates. American Journal of Transplantation, 22(2), 464–473. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.16803
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/41745
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.isversionof10.1111/ajt.16803
dc.relation.journalAmerican Journal of Transplantation
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourcePublisher
dc.subjectclinical research/practice
dc.subjecthealth services and outcomes research
dc.subjectintestine/multivisceral transplantation
dc.subjectliver transplantation/hepatology
dc.subjectorgan allocation
dc.subjectorgan procurement and allocation
dc.subjectorgan procurement and transplantation network (OPTN)
dc.subjectregistry/registry analysis
dc.subjectunited network for organ sharing (UNOS)
dc.titleImpact of the acuity circle model for liver allocation on multivisceral transplant candidates
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Ivanics2022Impact-CCBYNCND.pdf
Size:
605.87 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.04 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: