Cytokine use and survival in the first-line treatment of ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study

dc.contributor.authorStehman, Frederick B.
dc.contributor.authorBrady, Mark F.
dc.contributor.authorThigpen, J. Tate
dc.contributor.authorRossi, Emma C.
dc.contributor.authorBurger, Robert A.
dc.contributor.departmentObstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-23T11:46:35Z
dc.date.available2025-06-23T11:46:35Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.description.abstractBackground: Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and erythropoietin stimulating agents (ESA) may be used to support patients during chemotherapy. We assessed whether G-CSF or ESA were associated with progression or death in patients with ovarian cancer. Methods: Patients with ovarian cancer following surgery, were on a protocol to evaluate bevacizumab with chemotherapy. Guidelines for administering G-CSF and ESA were specified in the protocol. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed with landmark procedures and multivariate, time-dependent hazard models. Results: Eighteen-hundred-seventy-three women were enrolled, with no differences in clinical and pathologic variables among treatment group. Performance status, hemoglobin, and white cell counts were associated with G-CSF and/or ESA usage during treatment. Nine patients received no protocol directed therapy, leaving 1864 patients for this review. One-thousand-one-hundred-twenty-five patients received neither ESA nor G-CSF; 311 received G-CSF but no ESA; 241 received ESA but no G-CSF; and 187 received both. Median survival following a five month landmark from the start of treatment was 34 versus 38 months for those who did versus did not receive ESA (multivariate hazard ratio: 0.989; 95% confidence interval: 0.849-1.15) and 40 versus 37 months for those who did versus did not receive G-CSF (multivariate hazard ratio: 0.932; 95% confidence interval: 0.800-1.08). Conclusions: Neither ESA nor G-CSF had a negative impact on survival after adjustment of prognostic factors among patients with ovarian cancer receiving chemotherapy. ESA may appear to be associated with shorter survival in univariate analyses because factors prognostic for ESA use are also prognostic for progression-free survival.
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscript
dc.identifier.citationStehman FB, Brady MF, Thigpen JT, Rossi EC, Burger RA. Cytokine use and survival in the first-line treatment of ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;127(3):495-501. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.09.002
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/48909
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.09.002
dc.relation.journalGynecologic Oncology
dc.rightsPublisher Policy
dc.sourcePMC
dc.subjectErythropoietin
dc.subjectCytokines
dc.subjectOvarian cancer
dc.titleCytokine use and survival in the first-line treatment of ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Stehman2012Cytokine-AAM.pdf
Size:
199.28 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.04 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: