Efficacy of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Superficial Gastric Neoplasia in a Large Cohort in North America

dc.contributor.authorNgamruengphong, Saowanee
dc.contributor.authorFerri, Lorenzo
dc.contributor.authorAihara, Hiroyuki
dc.contributor.authorDraganov, Peter V.
dc.contributor.authorYang, Dennis J.
dc.contributor.authorPerbtani, Yaseen B.
dc.contributor.authorJue, Terry L.
dc.contributor.authorMunroe, Craig A.
dc.contributor.authorBoparai, Eshandeep S.
dc.contributor.authorMehta, Neal A.
dc.contributor.authorBhatt, Amit
dc.contributor.authorKumta, Nikhil A.
dc.contributor.authorOthman, Mohamed O.
dc.contributor.authorMercado, Michael
dc.contributor.authorJavaid, Huma
dc.contributor.authorAadam, Abdul Aziz
dc.contributor.authorSiegel, Amanda
dc.contributor.authorJames, Theodore W.
dc.contributor.authorGrimm, Ian S.
dc.contributor.authorDeWitt, John M.
dc.contributor.authorNovikov, Aleksey
dc.contributor.authorSchlachterman, Alexander
dc.contributor.authorKowalski, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorSamarasena, Jason
dc.contributor.authorHashimoto, Rintaro
dc.contributor.authorChehade, Nabil El Hage
dc.contributor.authorLee, John
dc.contributor.authorChang, Kenneth
dc.contributor.authorSu, Bailey
dc.contributor.authorUjiki, Michael B.
dc.contributor.authorMehta, Amit
dc.contributor.authorSharaiha, Reem Z.
dc.contributor.authorCarr-Locke, David L.
dc.contributor.authorChen, Alex
dc.contributor.authorChen, Michael
dc.contributor.authorChen, Yen-I.
dc.contributor.authorKhoshknab, MirMilad Pourmousavi
dc.contributor.authorWang, Rui
dc.contributor.authorKerdsirichairat, Tossapol
dc.contributor.authorTomizawa, Yutaka
dc.contributor.authorvon Renteln, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorKumbhari, Vivek
dc.contributor.authorKhashab, Mouen A.
dc.contributor.authorBechara, Robert
dc.contributor.authorKarasik, Michael
dc.contributor.authorPatel, Neej J.
dc.contributor.authorFukami, Norio
dc.contributor.authorNishimura, Makoto
dc.contributor.authorHanada, Yuri
dc.contributor.authorWong Kee Song, Louis M.
dc.contributor.authorLaszkowska, Monika
dc.contributor.authorWang, Andrew Y.
dc.contributor.authorHwang, Joo Ha
dc.contributor.authorFriedland, Shai
dc.contributor.authorSethi, Amrita
dc.contributor.authorKalloo, Antony N.
dc.contributor.departmentMedicine, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-28T21:06:14Z
dc.date.available2020-08-28T21:06:14Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractBackground & Aims Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a widely accepted treatment option for superficial gastric neoplasia in Asia, but there are few data on outcomes of gastric ESD from North America. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of gastric ESD in North America. Methods We analyzed data from 347 patients who underwent gastric ESD at 25 centers, from 2010 through 2019. We collected data on patient demographics, lesion characteristics, procedure details and related adverse events, treatment outcomes, local recurrence, and vital status at the last follow up. For the 277 patients with available follow-up data, the median interval between initial ESD and last clinical or endoscopic evaluation was 364 days. The primary endpoint was the rate of en bloc and R0 resection. Secondary outcomes included curative resection, rates of adverse events and recurrence, and gastric cancer-related death. Results Ninety patients (26%) had low-grade adenomas or dysplasia, 82 patients (24%) had high-grade dysplasia, 139 patients (40%) had early gastric cancer, and 36 patients (10%) had neuroendocrine tumors. Proportions of en bloc and R0 resection for all lesions were 92%/82%, for early gastric cancers were 94%/75%, for adenomas and low-grade dysplasia were 93%/ 92%, for high-grade dysplasia were 89%/ 87%, and for neuroendocrine tumors were 92%/75%. Intraprocedural perforation occurred in 6.6% of patients; 82% of these were treated successfully with endoscopic therapy. Delayed bleeding occurred in 2.6% of patients. No delayed perforation or procedure-related deaths were observed. There were local recurrences in 3.9% of cases; all occurred after non-curative ESD resection. Metachronous lesions were identified in 14 patients (6.9%). One of 277 patients with clinical follow up died of metachronous gastric cancer that occurred 2.5 years after the initial ESD. Conclusions ESD is a highly effective treatment for superficial gastric neoplasia and should be considered as a viable option for patients in North America. The risk of local recurrence is low and occurs exclusively after non-curative resection. Careful endoscopic surveillance is necessary to identify and treat metachronous lesions.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationNgamruengphong, S., Ferri, L., Aihara, H., Draganov, P. V., Yang, D. J., Perbtani, Y. B., Jue, T. L., Munroe, C. A., Boparai, E. S., Mehta, N. A., Bhatt, A., Kumta, N. A., Othman, M. O., Mercado, M., Javaid, H., Aadam, A. A., Siegel, A., James, T. W., Grimm, I. S., … Kalloo, A. N. (2020). Efficacy of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Superficial Gastric Neoplasia in a Large Cohort in North America. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2020.06.023en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/23743
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.cgh.2020.06.023en_US
dc.relation.journalClinical Gastroenterology and Hepatologyen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourceAuthoren_US
dc.subjectEGCen_US
dc.subjectstomach canceren_US
dc.subjectendoscopic resectionen_US
dc.titleEfficacy of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Superficial Gastric Neoplasia in a Large Cohort in North Americaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Ngamruengphong_2020_efficacy.pdf
Size:
11.31 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: