A prospective observational study evaluating the use of remote patient monitoring in ED discharged COVID-19 patients in NYC

dc.contributor.authorOh, Seung Mi
dc.contributor.authorNair, Singh
dc.contributor.authorCasler, Alexander
dc.contributor.authorNguyen, Diana
dc.contributor.authorForero, Juan Pablo
dc.contributor.authorJoco, Celina
dc.contributor.authorKubert, Jason
dc.contributor.authorEsses, David
dc.contributor.authorAdams, David
dc.contributor.authorJariwala, Sunit
dc.contributor.authorLeff, Jonathan
dc.contributor.departmentAnesthesia, School of Medicine
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-13T09:21:48Z
dc.date.available2024-09-13T09:21:48Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractObjectives: We investigated whether continuous remote patient monitoring (RPM) could significantly reduce return Emergency Department (ED) revisits among coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients discharged from the emergency Department. Materials and methods: A prospective observational study was conducted from a total of 2833 COVID-19 diagnosed patients who presented to the Montefiore Medical Center ED between September 2020-March 2021. Study patients were remotely monitored through a digital platform that was supervised 24/7 by licensed healthcare professionals. Age and time-period matched controls were randomly sampled through retrospective review. The primary outcome was ED revisit rates among the two groups. Results: In our study, 150 patients enrolled in the RPM program and 150 controls were sampled for a total of 300 patients. Overall, 59.1% of the patients identified as Hispanic/Latino. The RPM group had higher body mass index (BMI) (29 (25-35) vs. 27 (25-31) p-value 0.020) and rates of hypertension (50.7% (76) vs. 35.8% (54) p-value 0.009). There were no statistically significant differences in rates of ED revisit between the RPM group (8% (12)) and control group (9.3% (14)) (OR: 0.863; 95% CI:0.413-1. 803; p- 0.695). Discussion and conclusion: Our study explored the impact of continuous monitoring versus intermittent monitoring for reducing ED revisits in a largely underrepresented population of the Bronx. Our study demonstrated that continuous remote patient monitoring showed no significant difference in preventing ED revisits compared to non-standardized intermittent monitoring. However, potential other acute care settings where RPM may be useful for identifying high-risk patients for early interventions warrant further study.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.identifier.citationOh SM, Nair S, Casler A, et al. A prospective observational study evaluating the use of remote patient monitoring in ED discharged COVID-19 patients in NYC. Am J Emerg Med. 2022;55:64-71. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2022.02.035
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/43303
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.ajem.2022.02.035
dc.relation.journalAmerican Journal of Emergency Medicine
dc.rightsPublisher Policy
dc.sourcePMC
dc.subjectRemote patient monitoring
dc.subjectCOVID-19
dc.subjectEmergency department
dc.subjectHypoxia
dc.titleA prospective observational study evaluating the use of remote patient monitoring in ED discharged COVID-19 patients in NYC
dc.typeArticle
ul.alternative.fulltexthttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8868022/
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Oh2022Prospective-PP.pdf
Size:
990.63 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.04 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: