A prospective observational study evaluating the use of remote patient monitoring in ED discharged COVID-19 patients in NYC
dc.contributor.author | Oh, Seung Mi | |
dc.contributor.author | Nair, Singh | |
dc.contributor.author | Casler, Alexander | |
dc.contributor.author | Nguyen, Diana | |
dc.contributor.author | Forero, Juan Pablo | |
dc.contributor.author | Joco, Celina | |
dc.contributor.author | Kubert, Jason | |
dc.contributor.author | Esses, David | |
dc.contributor.author | Adams, David | |
dc.contributor.author | Jariwala, Sunit | |
dc.contributor.author | Leff, Jonathan | |
dc.contributor.department | Anesthesia, School of Medicine | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-09-13T09:21:48Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-09-13T09:21:48Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: We investigated whether continuous remote patient monitoring (RPM) could significantly reduce return Emergency Department (ED) revisits among coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients discharged from the emergency Department. Materials and methods: A prospective observational study was conducted from a total of 2833 COVID-19 diagnosed patients who presented to the Montefiore Medical Center ED between September 2020-March 2021. Study patients were remotely monitored through a digital platform that was supervised 24/7 by licensed healthcare professionals. Age and time-period matched controls were randomly sampled through retrospective review. The primary outcome was ED revisit rates among the two groups. Results: In our study, 150 patients enrolled in the RPM program and 150 controls were sampled for a total of 300 patients. Overall, 59.1% of the patients identified as Hispanic/Latino. The RPM group had higher body mass index (BMI) (29 (25-35) vs. 27 (25-31) p-value 0.020) and rates of hypertension (50.7% (76) vs. 35.8% (54) p-value 0.009). There were no statistically significant differences in rates of ED revisit between the RPM group (8% (12)) and control group (9.3% (14)) (OR: 0.863; 95% CI:0.413-1. 803; p- 0.695). Discussion and conclusion: Our study explored the impact of continuous monitoring versus intermittent monitoring for reducing ED revisits in a largely underrepresented population of the Bronx. Our study demonstrated that continuous remote patient monitoring showed no significant difference in preventing ED revisits compared to non-standardized intermittent monitoring. However, potential other acute care settings where RPM may be useful for identifying high-risk patients for early interventions warrant further study. | |
dc.eprint.version | Final published version | |
dc.identifier.citation | Oh SM, Nair S, Casler A, et al. A prospective observational study evaluating the use of remote patient monitoring in ED discharged COVID-19 patients in NYC. Am J Emerg Med. 2022;55:64-71. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2022.02.035 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1805/43303 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.02.035 | |
dc.relation.journal | American Journal of Emergency Medicine | |
dc.rights | Publisher Policy | |
dc.source | PMC | |
dc.subject | Remote patient monitoring | |
dc.subject | COVID-19 | |
dc.subject | Emergency department | |
dc.subject | Hypoxia | |
dc.title | A prospective observational study evaluating the use of remote patient monitoring in ED discharged COVID-19 patients in NYC | |
dc.type | Article | |
ul.alternative.fulltext | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8868022/ |