Epid-07. Access to Glioblastoma Clinical Trials for Rural Patients in the United States from 2010–2020

dc.contributor.authorNevel, Kathryn
dc.contributor.authorCapouch, Samuel
dc.contributor.authorArnold, Lisa
dc.contributor.authorPeters, Katherine
dc.contributor.authorMohile, Nimish
dc.contributor.authorThomas, Alissa
dc.contributor.departmentNeurology, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-05T12:31:47Z
dc.date.available2023-04-05T12:31:47Z
dc.date.issued2020-11
dc.description.abstractBackground: Patients in rural communities have less access to optimal cancer care and clinical trials. For GBM, access to experimental therapies, and consideration of a clinical trial is embedded in national guidelines. Still, the availability of clinical trials to rural communities, representing 20% of the US population, has not been described. Methods: We queried ClinicalTrials.gov for glioblastoma interventional treatment trials opened between 1/2010 and 1/2020 in the United States. We created a Structured Query Language database and leveraged Google application programming interfaces (API) Places to find name and street addresses for the sites, and Google’s Geocode API to determine the county location. Counties were classified by US Department of Agriculture Rural-Urban Continuum Codes (RUCC 1–3 = urban and RUCC 4–9 = rural). We used z-ratios for rural-urban statistical comparisons. Results: We identified 406 interventional treatment trials for GBM at 1491 unique sites. 8.7% of unique sites were in rural settings. Rural sites opened an average of 1.7 trials/site and urban sites 2.8 trials/site from 1/2010–1/2020. Rural sites offered more phase II trials (63% vs 57%, p= 0.03) and fewer phase I trials (22% vs 28%, p= 0.01) than urban sites. Rural locations were more likely to offer federally-sponsored trials (p< 0.002). There were no investigator-initiated or single-institution trials offered at rural locations, and only 1% of industry trials were offered rurally. Discussion: Clinical trials for GBM were rarely open in rural areas, and were more dependent on federal funding. Clinical trials are likely difficult to access for rural patients, and this has important implications for the generalizability of research as well as how we engage the field of neuro-oncology and patient advocacy groups in improving patient access to trials. Increasing the number of clinical trials in rural locations may enable more rural patients to access and enroll in GBM studies.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationNevel K, Capouch S, Arnold L, Peters K, Mohile N, Thomas A. EPID-07. ACCESS TO GLIOBLASTOMA CLINICAL TRIALS FOR RURAL PATIENTS IN THE UNITED STATES FROM 2010–2020. Neuro Oncol. 2020;22(Suppl 2):ii79. Published 2020 Nov 9. doi:10.1093/neuonc/noaa215.325en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/32225
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1093/neuonc/noaa215.325en_US
dc.relation.journalNeuro-Oncologyen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectRural health servicesen_US
dc.subjectClinical trialsen_US
dc.subjectGlioblastomaen_US
dc.subjectInterventional treatment trialsen_US
dc.titleEpid-07. Access to Glioblastoma Clinical Trials for Rural Patients in the United States from 2010–2020en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
ul.alternative.fulltexthttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7651115/en_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
noaa215.325.pdf
Size:
43.46 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: