Using Audit and Feedback to Improve Antimicrobial Prescribing in Emergency Departments: A Multicenter Quasi-Experimental Study in the Veterans Health Administration

dc.contributor.authorLivorsi, Daniel J.
dc.contributor.authorNair, Rajeshwari
dc.contributor.authorDysangco, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorAylward, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorAlexander, Bruce
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Matthew W.
dc.contributor.authorKouba, Sammantha
dc.contributor.authorPerencevich, Eli N.
dc.contributor.departmentMedicine, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-04T13:11:23Z
dc.date.available2023-01-04T13:11:23Z
dc.date.issued2021-04-14
dc.description.abstractBackground: In this pilot trial, we evaluated whether audit-and-feedback was a feasible strategy to improve antimicrobial prescribing in emergency departments (EDs). Methods: We evaluated an audit-and-feedback intervention using a quasi-experimental interrupted time-series design at 2 intervention and 2 matched-control EDs; there was a 12-month baseline, 1-month implementation, and 11-month intervention period. At intervention sites, clinicians received (1) a single, one-on-one education about antimicrobial prescribing for common infections and (2) individualized feedback on total and condition-specific (uncomplicated acute respiratory infection [ARI]) antimicrobial use with peer-to-peer comparisons at baseline and every quarter. The primary outcome was the total antimicrobial-prescribing rate for all visits and was assessed using generalized linear models. In an exploratory analysis, we measured antimicrobial use for uncomplicated ARI visits and manually reviewed charts to assess guideline-concordant management for 6 common infections. Results: In the baseline and intervention periods, intervention sites had 28 016 and 23 164 visits compared to 33 077 and 28 835 at control sites. We enrolled 27 of 31 (87.1%) eligible clinicians; they acknowledged receipt of 33.3% of feedback e-mails. Intervention sites compared with control sites had no absolute reduction in their total antimicrobial rate (incidence rate ratio = 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.98-1.01). At intervention sites, antimicrobial use for uncomplicated ARIs decreased (68.6% to 42.4%; P < .01) and guideline-concordant management improved (52.1% to 72.5%; P < .01); these improvements were not seen at control sites. Conclusions: At intervention sites, total antimicrobial use did not decrease, but an exploratory analysis showed reduced antimicrobial prescribing for viral ARIs. Future studies should identify additional targets for condition-specific feedback while exploring ways to make electronic feedback more acceptable.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationLivorsi DJ, Nair R, Dysangco A, et al. Using Audit and Feedback to Improve Antimicrobial Prescribing in Emergency Departments: A Multicenter Quasi-Experimental Study in the Veterans Health Administration. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021;8(6):ofab186. Published 2021 Apr 14. doi:10.1093/ofid/ofab186en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/30838
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1093/ofid/ofab186en_US
dc.relation.journalOpen Forum Infectious Diseasesen_US
dc.rightsCC0 1.0 Universal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/*
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectAmbulatory careen_US
dc.subjectAntimicrobial stewardshipen_US
dc.subjectAudit-and-feedbacken_US
dc.titleUsing Audit and Feedback to Improve Antimicrobial Prescribing in Emergency Departments: A Multicenter Quasi-Experimental Study in the Veterans Health Administrationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ofab186.pdf
Size:
238.86 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: