Does orthopaedic resident efficiency improve with respect to decreased fluoroscopic times in tibial intramedullary nailing? A measure of an ACGME milestone
dc.contributor.author | Bradburn, Kayla | |
dc.contributor.author | Patel, Jay H. | |
dc.contributor.author | Cannada, Lisa K. | |
dc.contributor.department | Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-11-15T18:26:12Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-11-15T18:26:12Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-03 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures is a surgical milestone from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). Our purpose was to evaluate if fluoroscopic time decreased with increasing resident experience and could be used as a measure of this milestone. Methods: Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes were used to identify patients who underwent intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures under the direction of fellowship-trained trauma attending staff. The data collected included patient demographics, fracture classification, fluoroscopic imaging total time, and the post-graduate years (PGY) of orthopaedic residency of the operating resident. Exclusions of patients included concomitant fluoroscopic procedures, inadequate records, or surgeries involving primary assisting residents with less than PGY-2 experience. We compared overall groups between half years and looked at individual resident years for each of the continuous variables. Results: When residents were grouped as senior (PGY-4 and PGY-5) or junior (PGY-2 and PGY-3), seniors used significantly less fluoroscopy than juniors (207.39 sec vs. 258.30 sec, P=0.018). In the first half of the academic year, PGY-2 residents completed tibial nailing slowest in terms of fluoroscopic usage (P=0.003). PGY-4 residents completed tibial nailing faster in terms of fluoroscopic usage than other years (P=0.031). In the second half of the academic year, PGY-5 residents used significantly less fluoroscopy than PGY-2 residents (P=0.035). Conclusions: As the ACGME currently has no measurement for resident progress and efficiency regarding tibial shaft intramedullary nailing, our data indicate that fluoroscopic measurements may be useful in assessing resident proficiency. | en_US |
dc.eprint.version | Author's manuscript | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Bradburn, K., Patel, J., & Cannada, L. (2019). Does orthopaedic resident efficiency improve with respect to decreased fluoroscopic times in tibial intramedullary nailing? A measure of an ACGME milestone. Current Orthopaedic Practice, 30(2), 129–132. https://doi.org/10.1097/BCO.0000000000000733 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1805/21346 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wolters Kluwer | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1097/BCO.0000000000000733 | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Current Orthopaedic Practice | en_US |
dc.rights | Publisher Policy | en_US |
dc.source | Author | en_US |
dc.subject | tibia fracture | en_US |
dc.subject | resident education | en_US |
dc.subject | fluoroscopy | en_US |
dc.title | Does orthopaedic resident efficiency improve with respect to decreased fluoroscopic times in tibial intramedullary nailing? A measure of an ACGME milestone | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |