Does orthopaedic resident efficiency improve with respect to decreased fluoroscopic times in tibial intramedullary nailing? A measure of an ACGME milestone

dc.contributor.authorBradburn, Kayla
dc.contributor.authorPatel, Jay H.
dc.contributor.authorCannada, Lisa K.
dc.contributor.departmentOrthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-15T18:26:12Z
dc.date.available2019-11-15T18:26:12Z
dc.date.issued2019-03
dc.description.abstractBackground: Intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures is a surgical milestone from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). Our purpose was to evaluate if fluoroscopic time decreased with increasing resident experience and could be used as a measure of this milestone. Methods: Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes were used to identify patients who underwent intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures under the direction of fellowship-trained trauma attending staff. The data collected included patient demographics, fracture classification, fluoroscopic imaging total time, and the post-graduate years (PGY) of orthopaedic residency of the operating resident. Exclusions of patients included concomitant fluoroscopic procedures, inadequate records, or surgeries involving primary assisting residents with less than PGY-2 experience. We compared overall groups between half years and looked at individual resident years for each of the continuous variables. Results: When residents were grouped as senior (PGY-4 and PGY-5) or junior (PGY-2 and PGY-3), seniors used significantly less fluoroscopy than juniors (207.39 sec vs. 258.30 sec, P=0.018). In the first half of the academic year, PGY-2 residents completed tibial nailing slowest in terms of fluoroscopic usage (P=0.003). PGY-4 residents completed tibial nailing faster in terms of fluoroscopic usage than other years (P=0.031). In the second half of the academic year, PGY-5 residents used significantly less fluoroscopy than PGY-2 residents (P=0.035). Conclusions: As the ACGME currently has no measurement for resident progress and efficiency regarding tibial shaft intramedullary nailing, our data indicate that fluoroscopic measurements may be useful in assessing resident proficiency.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationBradburn, K., Patel, J., & Cannada, L. (2019). Does orthopaedic resident efficiency improve with respect to decreased fluoroscopic times in tibial intramedullary nailing? A measure of an ACGME milestone. Current Orthopaedic Practice, 30(2), 129–132. https://doi.org/10.1097/BCO.0000000000000733en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/21346
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWolters Kluweren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1097/BCO.0000000000000733en_US
dc.relation.journalCurrent Orthopaedic Practiceen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourceAuthoren_US
dc.subjecttibia fractureen_US
dc.subjectresident educationen_US
dc.subjectfluoroscopyen_US
dc.titleDoes orthopaedic resident efficiency improve with respect to decreased fluoroscopic times in tibial intramedullary nailing? A measure of an ACGME milestoneen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Bradburn_2019_does.pdf
Size:
273.84 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: