An in-vitro comparison of four antibacterial agents with and without nicotine and their effects on human gingival fibroblasts

dc.contributor.authorBatra, Chandni
dc.contributor.authorAlalshaikh, Marwa
dc.contributor.authorGregory, Richard L.
dc.contributor.authorWindsor, L. Jack
dc.contributor.authorBlanchard, Steven B.
dc.contributor.authorHamada, Yusuke
dc.contributor.departmentPeriodontology, School of Dentistryen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-10T19:02:09Z
dc.date.available2022-02-10T19:02:09Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractBackground To compare anti-bacterial activity of 0.12% Chlorhexidine (CHX), 10% Povidone Iodine (PVD), Vega Oral Care Gel (VEGA), and Antioxidant Gel (AO) on Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sanguis, Fusobacterium nucleatum, and Porphyromonas gingivalis with and without nicotine and to evaluate their effects on human gingival fibroblasts (HGFs). Methods S. mutans, S. sanguis, P. gingivalis, and F. nucleatum were incubated with serial dilutions (1/4, 1/8, 1/16, 1/32, and 1/64) of anti-bacterial agents in media (with and without nicotine). Minimum inhibitory and minimum bactericidal concentrations (MIC/MBC) were measured, and confocal microscopy was performed. HGFs were exposed to serial dilutions (1/10, 1/100, 1/1000, and 1/10,000) of antibacterial agents with media. Water-soluble tetrazolium-1 (WST-1) assay and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) assay were used to assess proliferation and cytotoxicity towards HGFs. Results CHX and PVD significantly inhibited growth of all bacterial species (P < 0.0001) at all dilutions. AO and VEGA inhibited growth of all bacterial species up to only the 1/4 dilution. CHX and PVD decreased HGF proliferation at 1/10 and 1/100 dilution, whereas AO at all dilutions (P < 0.05). CHX and AO were cytotoxic at all dilutions (P < 0.05). VEGA was not cytotoxic to HGFs and did not affect HGF proliferation at any dilution (P > 0.05). An increased bacterial growth was seen for all species except P. gingivalis with addition of nicotine. Conclusion CHX and PVD demonstrate superior antibacterial properties, but significantly reduce HGF proliferation. AO is bacteriostatic at lower dilutions but is highly toxic to HGFs. VEGA was bacteriostatic and demonstrated no detrimental effects on HGF's.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationBatra, C., Alalshaikh, M., Gregory, R. L., Windsor, L. J., Blanchard, S. B., & Hamada, Y. (2022). An in-vitro comparison of four antibacterial agents with and without nicotine and their effects on human gingival fibroblasts. Journal of Periodontology, JPER.21-0262. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.21-0262en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-3492, 1943-3670en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/27761
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1002/JPER.21-0262en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Periodontologyen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourceAuthoren_US
dc.subjectAntimicrobial(s)en_US
dc.subjectAntioxidant(s)en_US
dc.subjectFibroblast(s)en_US
dc.subjectnicotineen_US
dc.subjectwound healingen_US
dc.titleAn in-vitro comparison of four antibacterial agents with and without nicotine and their effects on human gingival fibroblastsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Batra2021An-In-Vitro-AAM.pdf
Size:
1.08 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: